Quote from: Steamtyme on Today at 09:16:28 PM

Quote from: cutesgirl on Today at 08:54:46 PM

~snip~ Everything in the general terms and conditions applies, unless stated otherwise. Simple as that. I really recommend that you draw up the correct general terms and conditions and discuss this with a lawyer, for example. They have experience in this.

They have stated they have a Lawyer who has directed them on how the T0S should be laid out. Portions of it are in place for the future if they change their model to allow Fiat deposits - which come with different regulatory requirements. So for anyone concerned about providing KYC, there are a few options. Don't play if you legitimately wouldn't be willing to provide KYC documents for a jackpot size prize pool, or to clarify security scrutiny. That's your choice same as it is their choice to apply the terms they state in varying degrees up to everything they state at that time.

The thing about ToS, is that it can be applied at their discretion. So what you have seen is the conditions they can apply, as well as their explanation here about how they intend to apply them. They've been pretty clear about that (suspicion of fraud, Prizes of a large size that they require regulatory scrutiny) by providing several examples across several replies to try and clarify it.

For anyone who is comfortable providing KYC within the conditions stated, it seems there wouldn't be a problem. In the meantime I would continue to watch for any updates regarding ToS, and the services they offer. I wouldn't expect much to change, until a time they incorporate Fiat payment options.

I am really surprised why so many people are still interested in this site, which has made a mess of it since the beign. I've been keeping a close eye on this topic from post number 1. So they have a lawyer? Then explain to me that they have already adjusted the general terms and conditions 20 times and that they contained fraudulent things all the time that need to be adjusted? The supply from excluded countries was also incorrect. Still not correct by the way. Only amateurs work this way. There is not a single attorney in the world who would draft this or agree to this. It was a mess at Betnomi from the start, and it still is.
What a nonsense story about that KYC by the way. You either have a KYC or you don't. There is no middle ground.