Quote from: Miiike on November 11, 2020, 09:35:58 AM

Quote from: stobox_official on November 11, 2020, 08:50:01 AM

Quote from: Miiike on November 10, 2020, 02:32:47 PM

Quote from: stobox_official on November 10, 2020, 06:06:34 AM

Quote from: BK_099 on November 10, 2020, 04:06:33 AM

You tokenization packages seem expensive. How can someone beginner with a nice idea afford you? How many projects you've successfully accomplished under Stobox.

Stobox has a number of ongoin clients. The one which is public is - https://medium.com/@stobox_platform/accelerator-fund-igniter-100-announces-25-million-sto-with-stobox-e642e345a296
Even though tokenization brings advantages to any-size busness, we tend to focus on clients with existing revenue-generating business and sufficient funding. The technology of securities tokenization is yet to be adopted in the next 5-10 years. Eventually costs for tokenization will decline and be affordable to an idea-size business. After all, how would you attract finance to an idea-size venue anyway, if there is lack of budget for legal, tecnical and marketing activities.

Wasn't it a little bit backwards? Business goes tokenizing their company (or assets, or basically everything) because they need liquid fund. But to do that, to acquire liquidity, they first need to spend some money to pay your service, and it's arguably not cheap. While companies that can afford to pay your rate (or if we borrow your words, clients with existing revenue-generating business and sufficient funding) most likely have some collateral they can give to acquire loan from banks, thus probably won't need your service and doesn't have to tokenize themselves.

I didn't try to question your credibility, so don't get me wrong, I was just trying to determine your position here.

Let's be realistic. Money make money. Tokenization does not solve the problem of project's attractveness. It solves many other problems, including the problem with liquidity. There are hundreds of thousand, if not millions companies that generate double digit growth and have challenges with financing. Debt is not the solution for most of the cases. These companies are eager to grow, but have certain bolttle-necks which we resolve. Investors are likely to participate in investment opportunities by revenue generating businesses, but the demand for sucurities of an idea-stage company would be very low.

Finally, Stobox business model is to focus on revenue generating clients who are eager to shift their relationship with existing investors to blockchain. As well as to attract new investors by showing real growth, paying dividends, and performing marketing actions.

I'll have to agree with you on money makes money part. However, how sure are you on your position against competitor, in a sense that, instead of using your platform with their fees, startups and financially challenged companies goes to experienced blockchain individual which probably offered lower price?

There are plenty of options, however when one starts offering securities to public investors, one's better make sure that the risk/reward ratio is settled. Stobox offers not just the tech, but conprehensive solutions including legal, methodology and advisory.
[/quote]