Sorry, zikzik, I did not see your reply before. When I see RichGang as the latest poster in my Updated Topics list, I just sort of ignore the thread for awhile.

Quote from: zikzik on November 11, 2020, 05:01:34 PM

sorry nullius, i dont want to seem rude, and i really have no right to, but ...

this is not the first time you somehow dont read everything and then make your bold assumptions and "on paper" also accusing me of some wrongdoings ...

The account from Montenegro would not cover the losses on my account.

why would i create another account "to scam" them, if i am loosing big in mine anyways?

Although I am not an expert in sportsbook abuse schemes, it is my understanding that if you pull such a scheme, then you may win some here, lose some there—it is still gambling, but gambling with an unfair advantage. Moreover, it would give you an unfair advantage over all of the people who play fairly, according to the rules. If you are innocent here—if you yourself were playing fairly, according to all of the site’s rules—then surely, you must find such a thing objectionable!

The cost to the site from unfair play is ultimately borne by the innocent players, of course. Otherwise, the site would go out of business. I think that people who play by the rules should be glad that sites make sure that everybody follows the same rules.

Quote from: zikzik on November 11, 2020, 05:10:07 PM

betcoin.ag has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to connect me to the Montenegro account, apart from the things i have admitted in my original post:

1. Same wallet address for deposit
2. Some amount of the same (similar) bets

As I have explained multiple times, both here and in the KILLYMNE thread, I infer that they must have some other type of significant evidence. They must. And if they don’t, then the mediator should kick their arses!

I will not explain further, because just in case you are guilty, I do not want to give you hints about how to get away with it next time.

My perspective on this case—if you are new here, then you would not know: I have a reputation on this forum for technical expertise, specifically as to (a) Bitcoin, and also (b) privacy, security, and anonymity technologies. If you ask around here, then even the many people who hate me will admit that I know much on such topics, if they are fair. :-)

Quote from: nullius on October 19, 2020, 08:32:39 AM

Quote from: Lauda on February 04, 2018, 10:37:36 AM

Quote from: nullius on February 02, 2018, 11:11:48 PM

Tor user here. Cypherpunk who remembers that it took an excruciatingly long time to generate 4096-bit RSA PGP keys on 90s hardware. I am strictly pseudonymous. I am so dedicated to encrypting everything, everywhere, all the time,

You seem to know your privacy stuff. I respect people who work on their opsec.

Laudatory Lore.

Quote from: nasipadang on Today at 09:02:50 AM

The argument that they can not, because then the player would be able to cheat better the next time, is f** bullshit of course.

That is not correct. As I have said multiple times, at considerable length. Anyone with significant expertise in network security and abuse handling would know this to be the case.

If (if) Betcoin.AG has the type of technical evidence that I infer they must, then disclosing that evidence would indeed be tantamount to providing an instruction manual titled, “How Not to Get Caught Next Time”.

It is why I have repeatedly urged that the mediator should request and examine such evidence, in strict confidence (and if necessary, with a consult from an expert in the manner of an expert witness). This type of evidence can be complicated; and the mediator should not simply take Betcoin.AG’s word for what it means.

Quote from: RichGang on November 14, 2020, 11:51:52 PM

this is exactly how the scam works . the victim is already giving up. this is exactly what the scammer betcoin is looking for

Yes, it is so very plausible that somebody rich like you would just give up and forget about “around 1 BTC”. /s

As are many others, I am awaiting news about the SBR mediation. In fairness to all parties, I hope that the mediator will take adequate time to understand and interpret potentially complex evidence; but the case should nonetheless be disposed as promptly as practicable.

I observe that if zikzik is innocent, then it is to his advantage for the mediator to take some time scrutinizing the evidence. Betcoin.AG gave the mediator something. If that something is wrong, then the mediator needs to figure out what is wrong with it—if that something is right, then the mediator needs to understand it so as to make a clear judgment. Whatever Betcoin.AG showed the mediator, the mediator should not rubber-stamp it!

Quote from: nullius on November 05, 2020, 07:51:00 PM

Quote from: Betcoin.AG on November 03, 2020, 11:38:25 PM

We have just submitted our 6 page, 2100 word report with 27 screenshots to the mediator. They have many cases to rule on and this one has an enormous amount of information, so we ask for your patience while this is resolved. It is also possible they will need some additional information from either us or the OP prior to making a ruling. We will update the community with the results. Thank you.

I think that the highlighted portion shows good faith from Betcoin.AG. If they wanted for the mediator to say, “OK, wow, you showed me lots of fancy stuff! You win! Case closed!”, then that would be very bad; and if SBR rushed through here, then the SBR mediation process itself would lack credibility.

My perspective: I have dealt with real-world litigation in which the judge pretty much just rubber-stamped impressive piles of stupidity. Fair and judicious consideration of the evidence takes time.

That said, obviously, it is in the interest of all parties to get this over with as promptly as practicable. The longer that SBR takes, the longer that this thread will continue; that is certainly not in Betcoin.AG’s best interest.