Quote from: thunderjet on November 15, 2020, 01:23:46 PM

So,as you see ,it is not FUD. You cant mine DASH and be profitable even with the best available miner on the market and with access to the cheapest electricity.

Splendid demonstration, thanks. And it is evident that it is not FUD, that is trolling and interested arguments from the parasitic and malicious hierarchy that is implanted in DASH ... which is the basis of the information corruption that floods the project. A couple of years ago, several modest Mnodes, possessing a device or little more, proclaimed their power, often exclusively and arrogantly on the DASH forums, with respect to members of the community who did not have them (a selfish attitude inappropriate for an exercise in decentralization against which they were acting unconsciously and irresponsibly) ... today, almost any modest Mnode is aware of the little REAL power it has in the decision-making process of this farce in the process of concentration of power (and that that, due to modesty or not revealing the manifest capacity for abuse beyond what is strictly necessary, votes by one hundred (s) are counted in the DASH voting processes).

The intoxicating quizzie has taken half a second to chorus and clap a nick with 4 messages whose main contribution is, of course, accusing the rest of the opinions of FUD. Curious reaction, when the intoxicating quizzie tried to disavow my opinion with fallacies for "having been on btctalk for two weeks". By the way, opinions that have done nothing more than expose their continuous and methodical attempt to corrupt the exchange of communication with the simple exposition of Graham's hierarchical pyramid - intoxicating practice that has directed EVERY opinion on the thread -. Now the intoxicant quizzie aligns himself with another intoxicant ... whose lies you expose with a single click of factual information. One and the other intoxicant will pass to another "collateral smoke", do not hesitate.

Of course, his next post admits the irrefutable of your argument (he has no choice, thanks to your suitable information) ... although that will not stop his trolling: They will only try to dump more confusion to the topic. They are here for what they are.

Now we will go on to a succession of irrelevant nuances so that finally, although it ends up discussing nonsense absolutely collateral to the topic ... but it is that Ryan Taylor's own approach to a hypothetical reinforcement of DASH as a store of value was ALSO a trolling executed in an open house that, at the time, highlighted another fundamental underlying issue that the corrupt hierarchy of DASH tried to hide: That Evolution - currently "DASH Plattform", another intoxicating attempt to make it look like something else, to justify added delays - entered in ANOTHER YEAR of parasitism without being delivered. Ryan Taylor, supported by these corrupt intoxicants, has capitalized on a debate that was going to revolve around an unacceptable five-year delay (January 1 enters the SIXTH year) ... but without addressing fundamentals for an improvement in DASH such as store of value. On the contrary, it tries to place this debate in mirages unrelated to it - as an unbalanced distribution of monetary issues that coincidentally benefits the group in which the corrupt are found, the Mnodes ... and with which they want to totally control the governance of the chain ... and of course, marginalizing the group of miners (whom, remember, he tried to bypass in a first exposition exposing the possibility of eliminating completely and turning DASH into a POS system -.

The official position of CORE and the corrupt parasites of the DAO like DASH NEWS (rightly marginalized by a community of Mnodes that still claims its governance power ... but that will be increasingly threatened as a "sum of decentralized perspectives" by the whales that concentrate control of DASH) has NEVER been to reinforce DASH as a store of value. On the contrary, his attempts at trolling before any implanting any stable resource to the DASH system, which was one of the few that does not contemplate them, have been dirty and totally constant and repeated ... with Joel Valenzuela as the main intoxicant laughing at the stable coins with which the rest of the chains have tried to preserve the wealth of their users and repeating in their midst of corrupt intoxication that they were "just a fad" - or inviting, with Mason, disguised in VaultOro clothes, to DRAIN wealth from a DASH for just over $ 40 and transfer it to VaulToro, which they claimed was stabilizing wealth in DASH - when it is the exact opposite -. Now, that by chance someone has accepted the "store of value" on the agenda - after ruining tens of thousands of holders for years of waste and parasitism -, Valenzuela opens his infumable videos claiming "stability" as an objective for DASH (by the way , with several stable coins topping DASH in the rankings and half a dozen more stalking him closely, as he was repeatedly warned against his trolling on DASH NEWS and automatically CENSORED with the worst resources).

On the other hand, and also curiously, Ryan Taylor himself dismissed any performance in the sense of strengthening DASH as a store of value FOR YEARS. His crazy theory was that the very use and adoption of DASH would stabilize its price ... something completely ridiculous in an OPEN currency continuously distorted by the large speculative capital of the sector. Just as it is ridiculous to expect that DASH will reaffirm itself as a store of value by reorganizing an internal distribution of issues - in + - 10% of costs of + - 7% of monetary issue, that is, in a rebalancing of less than 1% of the total cap. In a project that yields to speculative capital that manipulates it like a toy, volatility margins of ... 97% !!!

All those measures ... just like the irrelevant nuances with which the trolls of the group that parasitizes DASH and wants to have it in exclusive property intoxicate any reasonable discussion or perpetuate it to total saturation, they are pure smoke and fireworks. If RTaylor wanted to, DASH would long ago be strengthened as a store of value, since there are resources available much more elementary and egective than the fantastic story that has been taken from the hat. (In which, by criterion and capacity, it CANNOT, better nor do we go on to assess it).