Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on Today at 04:46:47 AM

... just about the only sure thing in bitcoin price is we will have another pump, and another dump.

Which one is coming first?

The pump or the dump?

Quote from: nullius on Today at 05:08:59 AM

Quote from: heslo on Today at 12:43:55 AM

Quote from: dragonvslinux on November 15, 2020, 10:21:01 PM

BCHA is currently trading at 0.05 (5%) of BCH and 39 blocks behind as only mined 3 blocks compared to BCHN's 42. Ouch.

I think this will be remember as "The fork that nobody cared about"

No, that was bcash

Quote from: explorer on November 15, 2020, 10:58:22 PM

I think that drawer is getting full.

Quote from: JayJuanGee on Today at 02:25:15 AM

What a world.

What a world.

Quote from: nullius on October 01, 2020, 10:00:16 PM

There is now a much worse “four-letter word”.

So, after Roger Ver got forked over, he now forked up his own forking fork.

We need a new name for Bcash’s successors. I have been calling it “Btrash” for years. (Search my posts—or look at my sent feedback for 2018-03-12.) Any ideas, now that the forked fork has decided to go fork itself?

We can’t even call any such things “Vercoin”: for “Quid Inverecundius” would be more appropriate.

Forking onomastics are forking hard! The naming problem goes back to the fourth post in my history here.

Quote from: nullius on December 03, 2017, 08:05:43 AM

So-called “Bitcoin Cash” is neither Bitcoin, nor cash, in the sense that it has neither the unlinkability nor the fungibility of cash. It and its ilk are also generically different from honest altcoins, which at least have the decency to make their own names. I don’t even know what properly to call it—other than a scam, of course; and anybody who does not realize it’s a scam must be one or more of ill-informed, malicious, or incurably stupid.

[...]

I hope that helps. As for myself, I am still having trouble deciding what I should call Roger Ver’s little abortion. Perhaps ASICBOOSTCOIN. Any better ideas? “We’re-not-engineers-don’t-know-much-about-scaling-and-don’t-care-Coin” is too long.

N.b., that is archaic English; “___’s little abortion” used to be a sort of a stock phrase. If I understand correctly, it refers to miscarriages, not to induced abortions. —Split infinitive fixed in the above quote; * nullius slaps himself with a large trout.

I don't find a problem in continuing to call them in variations of bcash.. and to add various derogatories on there from time to time, too. Much better than some of the confusion in which there are attempts to rename the various trashcoins or crap forks and to use bitcoin in the name, which mostly they are derrivatives of bcash rather than trying to some how insert bitcoin into their name in an effort to attempt to gain legitimacy (or cause greater confusion).

You are probably correct with your inference that they are forking into greater and greater irrelevance, so might even be preferable to ignore them completely and allow them to fade into the sunset or wherever it is that they are fading into... especially since the many forks are taking less than a couple of percentage of bitcoin's hashing power at best, and much of the time the total hashing power is less than 1% of bitcoin's hashing power... so if they are trying to fork into relevance by trying to gain hashpower - (I am having my doubts that they are going to regain hashing power), they may just be sharing a smaller and smaller kind of attention of hashing power which goes along with a shrinking prices of that crapola, too.. even if they were to join forces, which would probably such joining of shitcoin forces be a smarter move if any of them could get along well enough to figure out such a force joining strategy.. ... all dee sheeeeiiiiitcoins unite!!!!!!.. hahahahahaha.. and still if you unite shitcoins, you still are going to end up with shitcoins.. so there is that angle, too.