Quote from: Anonymous on March 07, 2014, 12:09:37 PM

Quote from: masshandle on March 07, 2014, 09:45:23 AM

Why is this coin not getting more attention? Shocked

The dev is really only active over at cryptocointalk, not here. He didn't even post it here at all, not for launch nor after, a third party did. I'm not sure if he's trying to keep it quiet so diff is low for a bit or what, but it is something different, that's for sure! One unfortunate situation is a guy with 220mH has been on it since launch, and was (still is? haven't checked) the majority of the network for days... so as far as distribution of coins... there's a pretty big FLT dump coming from him if this thing hits an exchange.

The launch at cryptocointalk was strategic - I wanted to alleviate any issues before taking on a larger scale influx of mining. I dealt with the whole CAP clone forking with CGB last year, though CGB never had more than a few little forks, but we were watching it and scouring the code like hawks. But I knew with the faster block times relative to NVC (I used NVC as a base obviously) there could be issues.

And it was a good idea LOL because there were a lot of issues with forking by the pools, I think this release should help with that, and there are additional features to be added to the address/box matching routines, just have been busy dealing with the forking.

I saw that guy with the 220 Mh/s which was crazy, if I had 220 mH, I'd be going for the sure thing. I only have 4.5 mH LOL