Quote from: fiulpro on Today at 05:45:36 PM

Okay , this seems very good , but is spoon feeding the public for this long okay ??

Pumping money into the economy has its disadvantages as it could lead to inflation, but as the pandemic has grinded retail businesses to a halt, it becomes necessary to boost spending so as to revive the economy. The other option would be to react quickly and prevent the spread of the virus, but the US has already failed on this front. A vaccine is the best resort now.

Quote from: fiulpro on Today at 05:45:36 PM

If their budget is "x" let us assume, why don't they distribute "x/2" and use this "x/2" to start new job opportunities for them , they can even help the people to come in terms with the pandemic.

I haven't looked at the details yet, but I doubt the entire amount would be handed over to citizens, there would likely be a budget for MSMEs as well as large cooperations, inorder to keep them running or bail them out.

Quote from: fiulpro on Today at 05:45:36 PM

Most of these are going to the people who doesn't even need them, what about that Huh

Shouldn't only the jobless and the people actually in need be benefited by the bill Huh

.

Something like this was actually attempted in my country, the government proposed sending aid to individuals whose accounts held below a certain amount, but it didn't work out. A pandemic is affects majority of people in different ways, and if one has lost to any degree due to the lockdown, they should be entitled to relieve packages.

Quote from: fiulpro on Today at 05:45:36 PM

Plus why are aren't they also including the homeless without any house and documents ..maybe make a small centre for them to survive till the pandemic.

This is a very valid argument. They are part of the country and could aid or curb the spread of the virus, so they should be included in government plans as well. Not sure of any administration currently doing this.