@nulius you're kinda becoming like TOAA/cryptohunter. Friendly advice: Long posts like these isn't helping anyone. Keep it small and precise.
I have been making long posts since December 2017; have you seen
my post history? Unlike cryptohunter’s posts, mine are cogent and legible, and express new thoughts rather than only repeating the same drivel
ad maximam nauseam; to compare me to him says more about you than about me.
Anyway, I am here because this forum is not a
total idiot-site like Reddit (or worse,
Twitter).
Unlike Discourse, the software will be featureful and information-dense. Unlike Reddit, the software will support and encourage lengthy, high-quality posts (while allowing shorter posts).
I agree screenshots may not always be fully secured, reliable or even real for that matter. But the parties involved here don't seem to be kind of people who would fake a screenshot. Besides, like Marlboroza said, peloso hasn't disagreed with it, for what its worth.
I never questioned the authenticity of efialtis’ screenshots, which I presume to be true copies of the evidence. Perhaps you may try reading what I said:
A screenshot is no better proof than a quote; and a quote is much easier to read. If your word can be trusted about the authenticity of a screenshot, then you can be trusted to provide a quote—whereas if a quote from you is untrustworthy, then so is a screenshot!
[...]
For the sake of ocular health and safety, and to avoid a false sense of security, please stop using screenshots in situations whereby a visual depiction is not required. Thank you.
I saw efialtis’ evidence as sufficiently important that I spent my time and effort reconstructing it in a more usable format.
Counterproductive use of screenshots is an ongoing problem on this forum. It has long irritated me, my security sense, and my poor, tired eyes. Therefore,
obiter dictum, I have taken the opportunity to request that people use quotes, when a quote will suffice—and to explain why.
I am attempting to educate the users.