Wow, nullius certainly has gone from one of the most popular posters (before he took that long break) to being labeled a cunt by multiple members. What the hell happened?
Does anyone think nullius is an alt of Lauda? I always harbored a suspicion about that based on their style of writing and high level of knowledge of crypto, but having a suspicion isn't evidence of anything. I've also had a hard time believing Lauda would have abandoned the forum completely. Anyway. I'll keep an eye on this thread to see what the drama is all about.
With no hard feelings toward Quickseller, I do need to point out that he scooped you here—before he must have realized that my personality and Lauda’s are drastically different:
Of course it may turn out that nullius is actually an alt of Quickseller and we'll all look rather silly then, but that's a worry for another day.
I've seriously considered that. However,
[—snip insult to Quickseller, because I think that Lauda changed her mind about this. —nullius—]. Therefore, I find that rather highly improbable.
Nullius' knowledge about blockchain science and cryptography is a dead giveaway. His arrogance is a dead giveaway. He is an alt-account of a member who was here long before Bitcoin was even talked about in the mainstream. No way in the world he just registered in this forum last March 29, 2017. If you're an expert in blockchains, you pretty much have visited or even make posts here in Bitcointalk in the past.
Also the fact that he keeps butting into Bitcointalk and DT politics, I would assume he is one of the main cast of characters of the forum drama we are witnessing. A real newcomer would probably stick to Bitcoin discussions on protocol, trading or even the altcoin ann section.
He could even be Satoshi.

nullius is lauda. That is very clear. Anyone who does not see this is simply closing their eyes.
Who could have guessed that Quickseller would turn out to be the sane one!
—By the way, Mr Pharmacist, do you remember that on the same thread, you were accused of being Lauda? Hmmm.
If Nullius is Lauda, and Lauda is ThePharmacist, and OgNasty is Quickseller, and Quickseller is TomatoCage, am I still me? Who's writing this comment?
It is fun to watch this. I knew it would happen. Undoubtedly nullius is a cunt, however this is not the root of the conflict between suchmoron and nerdius.
Suchmoron views nerdius as a cunt for a few reasons. None of which have anything to do with being an actual cunt.
1. Nerdius can convincingly ( to imbeciles which make up 99% of meta and rep posters) appear both intelligent and cultured.
Suchmoon doesnt like that and hates being revealed as stupid. It knows nullius is more technically versed too. Nullius being kind of a very poor mans AM.
2. Nerdius can garner a lot of praise and grovelling respect from the dregs that also slobber over suchmoron. ( not that burger flipper direwolf that is suchmoons chief assmuncher or alt)
3. Nerdius will stand up to suchmoron.
In short nerdius is casting a shadow over suchmorons light here. Suchmoon doesnt like not being the centre of attention.
Up to this point, your post would be unusually insightful. Indeed, were it not for the—characteristic CH/TOAA use of language, it would not look trollish at all; and I think that most people would take it seriously. Food for thought... I have seen some intelligent people occasionally (futilely) attempt to engage you in discussion; now, I understand why, wherefore I hereby do the same.
In a yet-unpublished post (ironically in reply to mikeywith in Reputation; I should finish that), I remarked that I sometimes find it helpful to read a post without looking at its author’s name.
Oh, by the way:
It is fun to watch this. I knew it would happen. Undoubtedly nullius is a cunt,
I admit it! I confess! Undoubtedly, I am a cunt, in the colloquially figurative sense hereby intended!
So Antiheroic am I that once upon a time,
I made Lauda cry:He pwned you there, revealing THE TRUTH that you are not theymos.
Sorry, the truth can be painful sometimes.

I’m sorry I hurt your feelings, Lauda. My heart bleeds negative-trust red.
Both are cunts. [...] Nullius does it for pussy which I can say is more admirable comparatively
I can’t really give you credit for that juxtaposition, when it was suchmoon who called me a cunt.
At that, I think that you will soon be jealous of me, CH. Tell me, when was the last time that suchmoon created a thread about you? It has been awhile, eh? Oh, and did she ever call you a cunt in the title of the thread? (—Out of respect for her wishes my natural, healthy pleasure at being associated with cunts, I have chosen not to “derail” this topic’s title.)
Protip: I can take her down intelligently, as you cannot. You habitually hurl repetitive dumb insults. I hit where it hurts, when somebody deserves it. For suchmoon, what hurts most is for her true face to be revealed to her fan base.
Also suchmoon is now a grotty little sig spammer and nullius is not so another point there.
Well, I did make a political grandstanding offer to “sell out”. But you have no idea how much my PGP fingerprint is paying me!
/s
For the n00bs, that is my artful way of humiliating suchmoon over how she was was summarily FIRED! from Sarcasm’s signature campaign, which pays a much more lucrative bounty than cheapskate CM.
Uh-oh. Given how dumb they are, I guess I’m in trouble.
Being new here, you might not know this, but sarcasm on intertubes doesn't work. I should know because according to the
Master Ethical Mature Expert of Bitcointalk
I'm getting paid by sarcasm to carry it in my signature and I'm clearly doing a horrible job shilling it, seeing that my payments have been 0 so far.

^^^ Image is of suchmoon’s signature, at the time that the quoted post was made.
Cuntness scale.
Suchmoron 9
Nullius 7
Damn it! What must I do to beat suchmoon on cryptohunter’s cuntiness scale?
Perhaps I should study witchcraft.
—Nah, I already have a cult; and anyway, Kitty was a bit of a prude compared to me. ;-)
So to peg the cuntiness scale, I will simply add more cuntiness to this thread: