Quote from: nullius on Today at 04:30:40 AM

1miau complains about ~exclusion by nullius

Before you make your assumptions, you should read my post and understand it. I've nowhere "complained" that you have distrusted me, I've just pointed it out that the list of people distrusting me is very special and if you want be there, feel free to do it. I could not care less if you distrusted me or not. Tongue

And as expected, you deleted my post in your self-moderated censorship post.

Quote from: nullius on Today at 04:30:40 AM

I saw significant evidence that you make reports to the moderator based on political disagreement with the author of a post. This makes me distrust your judgment generally. It is injudicious, to say the least; and if your judgment is so unsound with moderation reports, then mutatis mutandis, I distrust your tags.

That is wrong, the moderator approved my report and deleted your post. Then, you complained about it using your habitual spam-wall rants. Cheesy

Quote from: nullius on Today at 04:30:40 AM

- Thereupon, I checked your trust page. I noticed that you issue too much positive feedback for relatively trivial reasons. I was recently discussing this exact problem with others here and in the Russian forum; and I have been intending to start a new thread about this, under which I plan to denote that you (and others) are excluded for this reason. suchmoon’s lunacy has been distracting me from more important activities...
  
  Giving too much positive feedback too easily facilitates SCAMS. Nobody complains about it—improper (or allegedly improper) negative feedback gets the attention, because people complain when they themselves receive negative feedback. Whereas if you green-trust people incautiously, then it is only a matter of time and luck before the consequences befall people who trust your judgment.
  
  You issue positive feedback for economic activity valued as little as 0.0002 BTC (maybe even lower), apparently for first-time transactions. When time permits, I intend to suss out JUST WHO THE HELL is bringing all such bad positive feedback into my trust network, and exclude them all. ~~~~~~~~ It is not about you personally, One Meow.

My point of view for trust feedbacks is: people should start reading feedbacks instead of trusting red, green or black numbers. That's why I'm always linking a reference, writing a text how much BTC was involved and then, people should make their own conclusion, if the person is trustworthy enough for the sort of deal they are about to do.
Instead of spoon-feeding people we should focus on making trust more visible on different sections that new users know about trust, can view each feedback and draw their own conclusions. A positive feedback is not "I'm endorsing this user blindly", it's an "I've done action xy and would do it again / it went well".

Maybe you should care more about your feedbacks where several negative feedbacks and also positive feedbacks could be criticised as well.

"Wer im Glasshaus sitzt, sollte nicht mit Steinen werfen"
~"Don't throw bricks, when you live in a glass house"

Quote from: nullius on Today at 04:30:40 AM

Quote

Your complaint about my exclusion of you, and the insulting manner of that complaint, confirm tenfold my distrust of your judgment.

Quote from: 1miau on Today at 01:09:58 AM
Feels nice to join this group of morons?

You are injudicious and unwise, and you personalize things that are not intended to so be. Forum usage protip: When somebody trust-excludes you no personal attack, and no evidence of spitefulness or impropriety, then the proper response is this:

Quote from: The Pharmacist on October 23, 2020, 05:49:28 PM
Quote from: nullius on October 23, 2020, 05:47:09 PM
That's how I see it anyway. I can agree to disagree on an issue like this one.
Quote from: nullius on October 24, 2020, 07:11:08 PM
Quote from: The Pharmacist on October 24, 2020, 03:55:52 PM
I excluded nullius from my trust list because [...]
No hard feelings.

Ok:

Feels nice to join this group of morons? Cheesy

https://loyce.club/trust/2020-11-28_Sat_18.56h/2143453.html

It's ok if / if not.
No hard feelings. Cool

Quote from: nullius on Today at 04:30:40 AM

Usage instructions: Each of those Loyce.club trust pages contains a convenient link which says, “BBCode for Bitcointalk”. You should copy and paste the BBcode as text, in pertinent part, instead of posting a screenshot. For example, see my reply when some trolls and idiots claimed that Lauda (“лayдa”) and I (“нyллиyc”) were in league with suchmoon (“cyшмyн”) (!):

Quote from: nullius on November 08, 2020, 08:45:17 PM

Quote from: KpoJluk on November 07, 2020, 10:03:09 AM

Oчeнь тoпopнaя cиcтeмa. Tepмoc - peбeнoк пo cyти, кoтopым мaнипyлиpyют пpидвopныe (лayдa cyшмyн фapмaцeвт).
[...]
Чтoбы пpипoднятcя в cиcтeмe - нaдo yмeть лизaть эти пятки пpидвopныx (лayдa фapмaцeвт cyшмyн нyллиyc итд).

Quote from: ~DefaultTrust on November 08, 2020, 10:23:05 AM

...и кoмaнды "фac" oт cyкмyнa нe пocтyпaлo.

ЛOЛ.

Quote from: https://loyce.club/trust/2019-12-07_Sat_11.54h/101872.html

[2019-12-07] ~Lauda's judgement is Distrusted by:
54. NEW suchmoon (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (3358 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: https://loyce.club/trust/2020-02-01_Sat_05.15h/976210.html

[2020-02-01] ~nullius's judgement is Distrusted by:
9. NEW suchmoon (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (41) 3617 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: https://loyce.club/trust/2020-04-11_Sat_05.25h/976210.html

[2020-04-11] nullius Distrusts these users' judgement:
19. NEW ~suchmoon (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (29) 3982 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Pictures are better.