Quote from: Foxpup on Today at 03:17:54 AM

Quote from: nullius on November 28, 2020, 06:45:04 PM

I tried to look, so as better to understand your objection to forum policy. Cloudflare threw me a Google CAPTCHA. I don’t do those anymore, especially not for read-only viewing of a web resource.

Sorry. In my defence, it's becoming increasingly difficult to find image hosting sites that a) allow NSFW art; b) allow hotlinking; c) don't resize/recompress/otherwise mangle the original file; d) don't use Cloudflare or anything worse; and e) don't do anything even more obnoxious that I haven't listed. Here it is via the forum's image proxy: ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fd.facdn.net%2Fart%2Ffoxpup%2F1572178064%2F1572178017.foxpup_btcntlk10yrs.png&t=619&c=82s3t2f-vi7JLA (NSFW)

Thanks. Neat trick.

Code:

$ sha256sum foxpup.png
07fb66d0aabb6bd44eeb8d911a1b7d6c63d87fc7cd4000a80dd1efe4f36e6763 foxpup.png

Now, this is why I wanted to see it:

The image does not depict nudity, not even cartoon nudity. I had assumed that it did. Beneath the black bars, I could not see that the genital area and nipples are (barely) covered.
The image is what I myself consider to be distasteful. I already knew that; but I could not say by how much, without seeing the uncensored image. Now, I can say that I have seen worse elsewhere on this forum. Furthermore, I can state that I often see other things freely posted which I would consider to be much more harmful to children. See below for an example.

Not that I want to ask for those to be deleted—to the contrary, it is an argument in my mind of: “If this is permitted, why is that forbidden?” The rules do not make sense to me; and I do not think that I am on notice of how I can follow them.

^^^ Thus began my reply to Foxpup, which I set aside because it takes time and tedium to locate suitable examples, etc.

To be continued, with whatever adjustments may be needed as the thread evolves.

Quote from: Laudanum on Today at 02:44:51 PM

I don't even like nullius for obvious reasons

Mutual. And you are severely mischaracterizing TMAN here. It is a shame that that undermines your credibility, because you raise a good and fair point about LoyceV:

Quote from: Laudanum on Today at 02:44:51 PM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138619.0

You forgot that LoyceV also runs didtmansayabadword.tk, which I found sufficiently amusing that I suggested that it should count whenever TMAN said the word “fork”. (← ⚠ ACHTUNG! The screenshot of Jihan’s infamous tweet is NOT SAFE FOR WORK!)

Quote from: LoyceV on November 28, 2020, 08:44:30 AM

but worse than that, I have kids walking around here too.

Quote from: LoyceV on November 28, 2020, 08:44:30 AM

And even though we don't raise them to be snowflakes,

Does “not raising them to be snowflakes” include teaching them to use language that would make a sailor faint? Admit it, you shitcuntarsedicktwat, you reported my posts because you disliked my masterful counterstroke against suchmoon’s middle-schooler grade potty-mouth trolling of me. As I alluded above in this thread, one of my deleted posts seriously-sarcastically documented suchmoon’s prior history of pride in not wearing a paid signature—hah, hah, only serious!^* Loyce, I think that that probably offended you more than the Courbet painting.

...and then, you rhetorically hid behind your wife and kids. Classy.

* For the record—a I have said before, repeatedly—I am quite ambivalent about paid signatures. I strongly dislike them myself. I have spent the past few years reserving the right to take a paid signature from a reputable, no-spam campaign, if I really need it to avoid starving. I have not done so, because I cannot stomach putting an American-style ad billboard on all of my posts. Ugly! Crass! Whereas Lauda thought that I was stupid for spending so much of my time here, with zero compensation—effectually devaluing myself; and I don’t think that she did anything wrong by wearing a paid signature. Anyway, none of that is the point here. suchmoon used to be so very proud of not wearing a paid signature, and now she has one; so...