Re: 😈 Obedience training: Nobody deserves to be the emperor of the world!
This campaign advertisement is paid for by Sarcasm:
Achtung, Achtung! According to the official policy of Bitcointalk Suchmoon’s Vision (BSV), “nullius is a cunt”. Quote-unquote. 🏆
 |  |  |
Much though I would prefer to spend my time more productively, I roll with the punches. Turn lemons into lemonade. If the forum’s most manipulative two-faced troll flies into a rage and calls me “a cunt”, then I will make art of it! —At least, if this forum’s policy permits art.
But if I take the time to write another long essay hereby, it should be after I catch up on the other stuff that suchmoon has been sucking my clock—I mean, my time away from, with her middle-schooler gutter-mouth antics about cunts.
No, really! So antiheroic am I that when I was called “a cunt”, I replied with, inter alia, a fine-art painting of a cunt from a French museum. Some Puritanical, thin-skinned pussy then reported my post, which was deleted...
Dissociated Press Headline News:
SWITZERLAND INVADED
By TAMARA LUSH November 29, 2020 GMT
[...]
I boycotted the Congress of Vienna; I never signed the Treaty of Paris, much less the Final Act. I think that Europe would be far better off under Napoleonic hegemony. —Or my hegemony. Muahahaha!
Anyway, if Switzerland breaks its own neutrality, then I will kick its arse.
Epic #FAIL: Start a topic titled, “Do you want more or less freedom?”—and then enforce the
[...]
Ordinarily, as a gentleman, I would not speak ill of a man’s wife in an Internet argument. But if you want to hide behind her, and she is a classless harridan who disrespects fine art, then she is fair game.
Not Safe For Wife
standard, when you are evidently married to this:[...]
Ordinarily, as a gentleman, I would not speak ill of a man’s wife in an Internet argument. But if you want to hide behind her, and she is a classless harridan who disrespects fine art, then she is fair game.
Let’s make a deal: You stand up for your own opinion, without suggesting that I must comply with your wife’s sensibilities per a “Not Safe For Wife” rule ; and I will not mention her again in this context. I did not like doing that. It is terribly rude. The politics of personal attacks on men’s wives (and otherwise family) is a despicable trend that started in the 1930s–50s. Very modern. I detest it.
; and I will not mention her again in this context. I did not like doing that. It is terribly rude. The politics of personal attacks on men’s wives (and otherwise family) is a despicable trend that started in the 1930s–50s. Very modern. I detest it....and then, you rhetorically hid behind your wife and kids. Classy.
My campaign will save the Nietzsche lessons and other serious discussion for another day.
On a popular level (—most suitable for panem et circenses—),