----
Thanks for the reply, I really apreciaty some local mod input here; and it's rather reasuring to see that we mostly share the standar for when a translation tool may be acceptable or not.
I have tried to check every post before hitting the report button, as many had a link with it and checking those was a really easy thing to do; copy, paste, compare, report... but on some others, there were some signs of strange words or grammar off things. There may be some room for the benefit of the doubt there; but I rather leave those ones up to the mod. There were some others that I couldn't report, because there were no off things at all.
There were however some posts that made perfect sense, and would have completely tricked me. They did have a link, so just in case I double checked, and realized that it had been a copy-paste translation. If there is a complete match, even if its readable and makes perfect sense, would the same principle apply? I know this is more of a personal interpretation of the rules, but still, I rather ask (no need to answer though)
Don't fool yourself alone. Online translators have improved to translate almost a text perfectly. But it still isn't.
As already mentioned above, a translator from 2016 to 2020 is not the same.
You will see a lot of matching of texts by translators plus online translators.
You need more flow...