Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on December 04, 2020, 11:35:38 PM

Quote from: BADecker on December 04, 2020, 10:36:13 PM

And how many are simply repeating what they heard from others.

Right, because if you haven't observed something yourself, then there is no possible way it can be true, which is why you think the Bible is factual. Lmao.

It's not as simple as that. Anybody can observe something and make a mistake about what he has observed. But if the observation hasn't been proven, there isn't any knowledge except by accident. There is only belief. Since there are various anomalies regarding Covid - PCR tests being used when they aren't made for this kind of usage, the lies about comorbidities, the lies about deaths that are attributed to Covid but are really caused by something else - we really need proof for the virus.

The Bible isn't about proof. The Ancient Hebrews were a race that lived to record many things that happened with their nation. You can study about them to see that they have strong tradition regarding Bible accuracy. This isn't proof, yet God doesn't ask that you have or show proof. Even Jesus said regarding His own resurrection, "Blessed is he who has not seen and yet has believed." But Jesus was talking about god. We are talking about a fake virus.

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on December 04, 2020, 11:35:38 PM

Quote from: BADecker on December 04, 2020, 10:36:13 PM

Would it show the whole virus sequence?

Yes. Not just from a single sample. Or a couple of samples. Here is the complete viral genome for over 38,000 different isolated samples: https://www.viprbrc.org/brc/vipr_genome_search.spg?method=SubmitForm&decorator=corona&selectionContext=1607124677703

But the virus isn't even real, right? Roll Eyes

Thanks for the website. I like it. Is Covid listed in there? Where? Could you also go the next step, and show where the Covid report(s) listed in there have actual proof listed of the way that they were isolated... you know, not the statement that such and such process was used, but the research notebook step-by-step that shows the process being done, and all about it.

More important is the part that the tested substance came from a sick or dead subject, and that this isolated "stuff" was injected to test subjects, who then got sick. How sick were they? Did any of them die? Was a substance extracted from any them and isolated to be the same substance that was injected and supposedly made them them sick, and was the same substance that sickened or killed the first person? You know. Simple little proof.

Now I realize that if you can find such info, that such report, even signed, isn't proof in a court of law, until there are witnesses who attest under threat of perjury. But that's a step we can go to next, after we have a suggestion of proof.

But your link is fascinating stuff.

Cool