~
I did not say that there are no sources, they are for "formality", at the very bottom.
~
What, then, are your claims against Ratimov? At the beginning, you write that there are sources, but they are not relevant.
Note: The sources that the author "allegedly" indicated are not really relevant to the case.
And then you write that they are, but specified for formality. You would have already decided on the line of accusation.
Sources and are specified for formality, so that it is clear to everyone where the text was borrowed from and that it was not the author of the topic who composed it.