Quote from: malkusch on March 08, 2014, 03:09:09 AM

Quote from: mgio on March 07, 2014, 10:12:23 PM

Quote from: malkusch on January 27, 2014, 10:47:46 AM

I suggest to create a new closed thread dedicated to Ukyo.Loan debtees to discuss the resolution constructively. That closed thread should be accessed by Ukyo plus deptees above a significant amount only. I would say a reasonable minimum is 10 BTC?

This sounds like a good idea. Can you set this up?

I'm more than happy to do that (although I started to enjoy the "ignore" function in this thread).

A threshold of 10BTC was just a random suggestion without knowing the affected addresses. So ~10BTC would qualify 36 addresses. Is this acceptable? I'm just so bored of some non-constructive disrupting entities.

Quote from: ADgordo on March 08, 2014, 01:22:44 AM

I suggest including the Graet.Loan people in this discussion if it will happen as the groups likely overlap.

I would suggest to stick with those 36 people (?) for the beginning and concentrate on a constructive process between Ukyo and its Ukyo.Loan debtees. No WeEx and no Graet.Loan. We can of course discuss the inclusion of more people in that thread.

No one bondholder is more important than the rest, regardless of size of debt. In any distribution, it would be proportional. IMO, the bets course of action is to get Ukyo to liquidate assets to pay bondholders, since this is what he used it for anyway. Assets may include bitcoin-denominated stocks, rights to ownership of invested projects, etc.