Quote from: HashFast_CL on March 08, 2014, 08:29:04 AM

Quote from: Unacceptable on March 08, 2014, 08:19:20 AM

Quote from: HashFast_CL on March 08, 2014, 08:11:50 AM

Quote from: jjiimm_64 on March 08, 2014, 07:49:39 AM

Quote from: HashFast_CL on March 08, 2014, 06:56:52 AM

Is there any proof of a CT box doing 2TH, or are the haters making stuff up just to troll?

I cant believe you show your face in another thread.... go back to your self moderated thread until your company stops scamming people....

Minor Miner advised me to

Quote from: Minor Miner on March 07, 2014, 12:30:05 AM

stay up to date on what is available in the market right now.

So that's what I'm going to do.

Now, have you any input on the issue of whether or not Cointerra's claim to have "greater than 500 GH/s" is true?

All I see on this thread are numerous reports of the "greater than 500 GH/s" claim in the OP being empirically false, citing demonstrated performance shortcomings of 20% under spec or worse.

Given the two unverified claims of 2TH CT boxes in the wild, we should resolve the matter in a calm, rational manner.

AFAIK only HashFast has demonstrated a working 2TH miner (at this week's Austin BTC conference).

But I'd love to see proof my belief is outdated or wrong. Are you going to help answer, or just attack me for daring to ask an on-topic, if impudent, question?

I read your sig too fast & got "Halfassed Community Liason" Cheesy

So you got a new title Huh

True or False: CoinTerra's first ASIC's Hash-Rate is greater than 500 GH/s?

-HashFast didn't provide windfalls by refunding $100 BTCs with an equal number of $1000 Bitcoins, therefore it's a Ponzi!!11!

If nothing we do could make you consider buying from us, why are you posting here? Batch One EVOs sold out almost instantly, so exhibiting your grudge in public hasn't had any noticeable effect. Better get a Batch Two before they're gone!

Sounds like BFL_Josh got a second job Cheesy