Quote from: xkcdd on Today at 03:50:18 PM

Quote from: toknormal on Today at 12:30:02 PM

Miners meanwhile are a business. It's a very different model. They're not investors in Dash, they're investors in mining equipment.

Bravo! I couldn't have said it better myself! Are you coming around to the way of the SPORK21, Tok? Grin

People buying 1000 DASH collaterals are however investors in the network, that is why Ryan Taylor tipped the scales to favour the Mnodes and drive further investment into DASH and not Bitmain. He sounds like a smart guy don't he? Cheesy

For an idiot like you, yes, because Rtaylor knows perfectly well the type of greedy illiterate to whom he directs his manipulative solutions. And with that criterion, almost standard in the network of retarded con artists, who can be surprised by a shameful debate of almost a page and a half of endless stupidity like the one you are giving us?

The "big fish" that your suicidal and aneuronal model is looking for are not DASH holders with thousands of tokens that have not configured Mnodes, but OUT-of-DASH capital that you are trying to attract.

Therefore, any ROI oriented to that profile, must be estimated in BTC, fiat or Ether, the capital contributed by the potential scammed ... but precisely NEVER in DASH.

The absolute last straw is to expose it in terms of a centralized garbage that has failed to retain even 10% of its wealth since ATH. It's like offering to exchange Gold for radioactive dung. Or by shots to the temple. (Although, of course, it is the only thing you can expose, since any other reference is absolutely ruinous).

DASH is priced Spring 2017. The scam network has gobbled up any capital inflows since then. Now, even in S2F it drowns you, because in the middle of the crypto rally, it does not interest even the most idiots ... so that parasitic demand will not only devour the Treasury, but even the scab on the walls.

By the way, the TokNormal model is also wrong. Without endowing DASH with a real decentralization, the trend will continue to gobble up resources (in addition to becoming more concentrated with each step).

The endogamous and claustrophobic measures in your obsessive framework in a loop of drain and destruction of wealth only contribute to error No. 1 that threatens the project: That you subordinate its growth to mass adoption, but condemn adopters to enrich themselves. Treatment that they will despise for the benefit of another chain that DOES integrate them fully and enriches their contribution.