Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: [SCAM] Adkinsbet not pay! 41.55 mbtc
by
Royse777
on 22/12/2020, 21:26:09 UTC
Hang on a minute!
@wildan88, @BitcoinAccepted what just happened? Suddenly it seems some attacks on me. It's late here, I will create a reputation topic tomorrow and I would invite you two to join me there. And prove everything that you have said against/about me (I will specify tomorrow once I will have the topic). In this topic it's better focusing on the accusation. Let's not make things about me and you.

Quoting for reference:
What strikes me most about Royse is that he is very active in every accusation topic and focuses all his attention on Adkinsbet.

At first I thought he was honest and sincere, but he seems to side with the customer in every message.

I would like to ask Royse what his problem with Adkinsbet is, the way he talks now really makes no sense.

I am very surprised that Royse777 continues to interfere with every topic in this thread directed against Adkinsbet. Apparently it doesn't occur to him at all that this might be the same user.
 His claim about the KYC is, of course, nonsense. If you have users of the same IP address, isn't that 100% proof? Yes in theory you can also live with the four of you at that address, but you can also manipulate a KYC by having someone else take a photo or use someone else's ID.
Also, don't fully understand why you state that you have to perform a kyc before someone has to deposit money. If you get 20 registrations in a day, and those people want to gamble, how do you plan to do that?
Indicate that they cannot deposit anything before they have been verified? Royse777, you may be a respected member of the forum, but you don't understand gambling and business.
If you don't understand it, then you shouldn't write nonsense and be the smart ass, which is what you're doing every time. I am very annoyed by that. In the previous accusations topic you were already dealing with nonsense information, and now you are involved in every topic directed to Adkinsbet. Funny that you always choose the side of the op.


@sempak, I don't understand what you are saying here. Please be specific.