Quote from: pooya87 on December 23, 2020, 06:10:04 AM

Quote from: BullRunw2023 on December 23, 2020, 03:28:11 AM

1. The lack of authority from the crypto founder to resolve issues from its user. We will not talk about the authority coming from the government because many of us here will not agree of them to interfere in the system because they can just ruin the anonymity by conducting KYC and other preventive measures. So, what I am seeing is the lack of addressing problems from the founder of the crypto. After they implemented the system they will just say that system is good and ready to go and if you as a user will get mistake then that is your problem and your fault. No one had force you to join in cryptocurrency and you must adapt to it. This is not good for those who wishes a better system.

You are confusing a bunch of irrelevant things here!
For example user making mistakes is not something that anybody can solve, even if the "founder" had any authority. Otherwise it would simply break the system.
Things such as KYC, etc. are also irreverent here, in fact if the "founder" had any authority it meant that there were a single point of failure where the government could for instance pressure to implement backdoors and other malicious things into. Just look at centralized shitcoins and how they are failing.

Quote

2. Miners service are decentralize.
Who would ever thought that they could get you a 1$ transaction of a fee which could be more than a thousand dollar's fee? There is something wrong and miners should be held liable into this by only limiting the transaction fee to be deducted not more than the transacted amount. They are abusing due to the fact that their service is in demand especially the bullish trend of bitcoin.

Miners don't set the fees, users do.

Quote

3. The abuse may be only happening and will be resolve between both parties. Same thought about in number 1 but this talk about resolution between both parties and not about the lack of authority from the founder. A certain user could mistakenly send high amount in the transaction without checking it and will be requested for a refund. The other party could deny and there us nothing you could do because it was your fault and no one can help you.

Again you are describing user mistakes and no amount of "authority" can prevent that without fully centralizing the system and removing basic principles such as immutability.

Quote

4. Complete decentralize platform may gone wrong.
Again, there is no perfect system and if there will be errors that will going to take place expect that you can no approach any technical team to resolve the issue. Reminders that there are no technical team to review in that errors but only the forum provided.

This is very vague but again it sounds like user mistakes.

Quote

5. Abusers are free to do scamming in their own decentralized way. The ICO projects before are really worth it and investors are really earning after investing but today they created a lot of ways in crowdfunding but many of it are just like robbing a bank easily stealing crowdfund even in the daylight.

So much to improve about the cryptocurrency and I think that there should be a need to insert centralized system to get the authority not coming from the government but to the cryptocurrency founder itself.

ICOs are scamming people on semi-centralized and fully centralized platforms already and there is nothing anybody doing about them. For example the third wave of ICO scams were performed under the name "IEO" where E stands for exchange, 100% centralized exchanges were responsible for these scams and yet they happened.
Again this argument is another case of "user mistakes". Nobody can prevent someone from burning their money.

The fourth point doesn't sound like users mistake, DeFi projects for example depends on its code and if something happens to the code it's over, even if they manage to work something out the damage will be too high to handle, also it's easy for scammers to evade arrest through decentralized projects, to me it seems like dex is causing more damage than CEX