Quote from: ScumBuster on Today at 01:24:09 PM

Profile of this abuser -- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2627711

The only people who defend and say it is not plagiarizing are people he includes on his trust list

I'm not trying to be obnoxious about asking for the profile, I just know how lazy some of us are - Thank you.

Quote from: ScumBuster on Today at 01:24:09 PM

The only people who defend and say it is not plagiarizing are people he includes on his trust list

I don't think that correlation proves causation or whatever the saying is. Could it be the case that Ratimov is so easily swayed by any defense of himself that he adds that person to his trust list? That wouldn't make that user's opinion or defense any less valid through Ratimov's support of it; does that make sense? Just an idea.

Quote from: ScumBuster on Today at 01:24:09 PM

Everyone objective says it is plagiarizing. Still don't know why mods don't ban.

In my opinion, these two sentences are contradictory.
The mods are objective, in this situation, and if they agreed that it was plagiarism then he would be banned.
Unless there's some conspiracy that goes deeper than I understand, in which case this thread just got a whole lot bigger.

Quote from: ScumBuster on Today at 01:24:09 PM

Retaliatory feedback is wrong, doesn't matter if feedback you have been left is correct or not.

Yes, agreed

Quote from: ScumBuster on Today at 01:24:09 PM

Death threats in feedback is against rules and he should be banned.

If this was in PM you can report the PM and if it was in a public post then it should be easy to point at it as evidence.
I didn't see any, did I miss it?