Quote from: toknormal on Today at 04:12:22 PM

Quote from: birdonthewire on Today at 02:20:04 PM

As long as there are other means of producing a DEFAULT and perfectly defined increase in supply, that statement is not correct. And TokNormal knows it perfectly.

Limited supply on its own is worthless and I think you know that. At least the hundreds of dead coins that have limited supply and no hashrate understand it.

I can paint you a picture that I guarantee will be a limited 1 unique unit, but it won't be as "limited" as a piece of fine art from a recognised artist who put a lifetime of effort into going to art school, practicing their technique and garnering increased market recognition...

Even what is indicated in red I can read [/ b] [/ color] ... because I have exposed that ... you only try to link it to production, which is different. [/b]

"Miners do not create SCARCITY, even if you try this deceptive association of ideas with dissimulation. They are supposed to automatically transmit a production cost to the mined token (which is also not correct per se) ... because attention! It is only so if the token is UTIL, if it is in demand "

I'm trading BTC ... and maybe later break down your post (to hit that hard head that you don't want to open Grin

) ... although everything will lead to separating the factors that you try to associate in a set that does not exist.

The Reserves model that I propose DOES provide a transfer of real wealth. You're not stupid ... and you can't help but see it. And you can't help but see that without decentralizing DASH, the next victims are you, the MNodes, as vulnerable to a hyper-concentration model ... as everyone else.