Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner 0.7.22 - Nimiq/Kawpow/Ethash/Etchash/Cryptonight and More
If you are happier with the worse miner and less money, I think no one will miss you here. It's still your decision.
Merry x-mas to all
Merry x-mas to all
It's not a question of being happy, it's an observation everyone says that PH or Claymore cheats on sharing but no one really has proof.
I look between my rigs and my pools (I tested 4 pools same things)
9 * RX580 NITRO + SE / 8GB straps
Claymore: 304MHS
PheonixMiner: 302MHS
TeamRedMiner: 294MHS
LolMiner: 294 MHS
We still lose a lot of power from one miner to another. I haven't done the share number test yet.
it's just a shame to fall asleep on optimizations, development of 4GB cards ...
To release a miner without memory optimizations, having to use 50 software for that, claymore was good for that.
Here is an article where they proved that Phoenix miner inflates hashrates by about 3%.
https://github.com/Kerney666/trm-ethash-miner-tester
That sounds odd, so not a specific gpu crash, but all gpus drop to 20 MH/s each instead? That's not the typical error scenario really, I wonder what's going on with the rig at that time. You don't see any excessive cpu consumption, and gpu temps are fine all the time, Rave is controlling fans?
Hi kerney666- just fyi my rig hash rate has been stable now for a couple days since I restarted it. So my guess that odd drop in hash rate may have been a pool side problem. Stable and happy with TRM now. Sticking with it because I don't like how Phoenix tends to overstate hash rate. Plus, TRM is about 10W cheaper for my 5x570 rig. I also ran top from the command line in Rave and saw CPU utilization is very low.
The rest of the test, twice on two different days
9 * RX580 NITRO + SE / 8GB straps || 1H10 TEST
PheonixMiner: 303MHS / 247 SHARES
TeamRedMiner: 297MHS / 299 SHARES
It just lacks the improvement of the reset of the card fans when you shut down the software.
And optimized the software for polaris cards (ex: rx480 / 580/590)
You made about 17% more with TRM....its why i really like TRM for my AMD cards
Yes, but there is still work on the stability of the software, sometimes I have DEAD GPUs, I have to restart the software and it's good, sometimes the fans are not working, bad speed or even cooling correctly but remains stuck at 3200RPM with a low temperature .. I know that the management of card fans is in beta, but it is very important.
Then optimized a little more for polaris with memory straps