So according to your vision, BTC is good because it goes up.
I buy BTC because it has been going up for more than 10 years, and if I buy today in a few years I will get rich.
Is this the reason that BTC makes better than other currencies?
I'm not talking about Dash, or if he has failed with his nodes, or if he will fly to the stars tomorrow.
I'm talking about you saying that if I buy Dash, I finance the master node holders. But I can freely buy as much Dash as I want for others to finance me hoping to make a profit in the future.
Don't BTC holders expect to make a profit on their investment. Isn't it a fad that BTC rises in a few months more than in three years?
Is 6X growth in 9 months organic for you?
I am a BTC holder, and I ask myself questions every day about what makes me keep BTC in the long term, and the only answer I have is to be able to sell it to a more expensive one every day.
Can this last forever?
a greeting
BTC is (officially) an attempt to standardize global savings and compete with FOFOA's famous FreeGold that has been working perfectly since the mid-70s. But BTC is a fiat catalyst, nothing more: Real Wealth is already synthesized at the molecular level that is, unsurpassed as a synthesis...and besides, indestructible ... for what it is insurmountable ... and less for a technological system, which is fragile by definition (not its "perfect software approach", but its own structure, composition or format : but it is IMPOSSIBLE to entrust global savings to such a system. This system needs to minimize risk, that is its unique inalienable objective) .The volatility of BTC (actually, another system of drainage such as the one that the DAO hijackers want to carry out for private and elitist benefit in DASH) limits it, moreover, as a Global Savings Standard and a cumulative and progressive Store of Value, but at least it is particularly usable while the party is still on, because the BTC leaks are, at the very least, interactive and decentralized. That's why BTC works ... because every supporter can run that fiat catalyst at his own convenience, whether you're a wall street millionaire shark or a humble bartender in Berlin. As a fiat catalyst, and increase private wealth while the fiat survives , it works.
The underlying problem of DASH is that it does not respect the wealth that is delivered to its structure (and by extension, the individual ownership of that wealth). It is not a store of value because it is emptied for the benefit of a centralized elite. It is too gross a scam as the retards who wanted to kidnap her ... and have killed her. A pity, because Duffield's self-financing system raised resources to fight with solvency against the speculative capital movements of the sector . A part of the "workers" of the DASH structure went beyond their limits, monopolizing them and turned the synergistic system of collective enrichment to which Duffield aspired into the theft of 300 bastards, because he did not contemplate that the legislative structure of DASH would become against the general interest of the project, centralizing rights and benefits and marginalizing the global expansion of the community. He did not think that Mnodes would be the thieving garbage they have proven to be. ... but hey, the fact is that it is already too late to rethink that, possibly.
There are those (particularly from the monero community) who assert It was designed that way from the very beginning with the insta(fast)mine right at the project launch followed by the decision to lower the amount every to be created. To support dash you always had to have faith these events were honest mistakes not preplanned.
I do think dash had potential given its self financing to be a real force it has seemingly taken a different path.