Quote from: BTCGOLD on Today at 02:38:14 PM

The fact that Royse is involved in every Adkinsbet topic is also a very strange thing. His friend has a problem, and Royse is trying to solve this by asking his DT friends to give them a red card and want to pressure them with this.

I did not check every AdkinsBET so am not sure what is exactly going on with them and have no idea who is posting in those threads (not a good sign if there are many scam accusations against them) so cannot comment on whether Royse777 is posting in them or not but from what I can recall this is the only one I have posted in.

For your information, there is no DT manipulation going on here. I cannot speak for other DT members but Royse777 has not asked me collude with him in order to pressure AdkinsBET therefore your allegation is disingenuous at the least.

Quote from: BTCGOLD on Today at 02:38:14 PM

Quote from: JollyGood on Today at 02:34:16 PM

If you are saying that you made the OP whole again by sending his deposit back but not his winnings then that is something that is something the majority of the community here will not be able to accept as an appropriate outcome. Kindly reconsider.

Maybe the way forward in this case would be to simply send the full winnings to the OP and then enforce your newly updated terms and conditions regarding your VPN policy strictly enough to stop users depositing funds and stop users signing up when VPNs are used therefore you cannot use VPN as an excuse when users want to withdraw.

I hope you reassess the situation, pay the OP what he is owed then we can all move forward.

Quote from: AdkinsBET on Today at 09:56:30 AM

ToS have been violated after the activity on his 2nd deposit(usage of VPN). We decide to refund the deposit from the 2nd deposit (37 mBTC).
The player has been contacted also on his Email. After this, we consider the case solved.

I find this very interesting to read. If major betting sites such as Fortunejack, Stake and Sportsbet only return the deposit and not the winnings, then everyone agrees to this solution and write that the sites are in their right.
When Adkinsbet opts for this solution, it is suddenly not accepted by the community. Thought DT members were on the forum to give an honest opinion and they could be trusted, but more and more I started to get the feeling these accounts are used now trying to pressure Adkinsbet to force them to pay the full amount. I can not imagine this is the way DT members should act.
The fact that Royse is involved in every Adkinsbet topic is also a very strange thing. His friend has a problem, and Royse is trying to solve this by asking his DT friends to give them a red card and want to pressure them with this.

Quote from: actmyname on Today at 11:32:15 AM

Quote from: AdkinsBET on Today at 09:56:30 AM

ToS have been violated after the activity on his 2nd deposit(usage of VPN). We decide to refund the deposit from the 2nd deposit (37 mBTC).
The player has been contacted also on his Email. After this, we consider the case solved.

That's weird, because the ToS didn't have those absolute anti-VPN rules back then. What in the hell are you talking about, Ray?! What ToS violation did he break apart from simply using his VPN? Why are you applying ToS from January 4th onto someone that hasn't played since December?

More importantly: did you tell players that you changed the ToS and have them agree to the new terms?

Thank you for your input in to this matter. I think actmyname addressed the issue you raised. Applying terms and conditions to someone who did something long before the updated terms were introduced is just not correct.