Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:24:46 AM

Quote from: Vaculin on Today at 07:10:01 AM

Regarding this feedback, may I know the specific "forum standards"? That would be very helpful for me if you will show it so I can improve my post. TBH, I didn't expect of this as I'm mostly participating on gambling discussions where I know I'm really knowledgeable of.

Do you know what is mean "spam"? not just if we talk about this forum standard, already in general. You can get information very quickly if you want.
What I find on my first result in search

Quote

Definition of spam (Entry 1 of 3)
: unsolicited usually commercial messages (such as e-mails, text messages, or Internet postings) sent to a large number of recipients or posted in a large number of places

You don't have to point me to the definition of spam because I know what it meant. I was only asking for a specific standard on evaluating a post to be considered as spam. When I make a post, I don't think I'm spamming but I understand that it's possible that some of my post will be deleted because it's considered spam by those who report it and the moderators. FYI, I don't remember anymore that I have deleted posts in the last 6 months, though I can't verify as I usually delete that kind of message in my inbox.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:24:46 AM

how do you connect leaving feedback trust with spam?

I would answer your question with a question.
What's the forum standard for trust feedback? Isn't it out of standard if it's use for a non trust related issue?

I mean, it's the moderators job to evaluate the post, if you keep spamming, you'll be ban, that's it.

Quote from: actmyname on Today at 10:52:46 AM

Quote from: Vaculin on Today at 07:10:01 AM

Quote

Part of the Spammer Blacklist: this user has made at least 50 replies that are not up to forum standards. This user is part the top 1000 worst spammers of all time.

Regarding this feedback, may I know the specific "forum standards"? That would be very helpful for me if you will show it so I can improve my post. TBH, I didn't expect of this as I'm mostly participating on gambling discussions where I know I'm really knowledgeable of.

Just so I can make this point clear for anyone that wants to question the feedback:

Moderators considered reports of your posts good. This means that moderators thought that at least 50 of your posts broke the forum rules, most likely regarding spam.

Thank you for educating me with that, I'm not aware of it. But I don't agree with you in using the trust system to tag people you think have spam the forum. I may have some spam posts (which I explain above) but I'm not a spammer.

Trust system are suppose to be use for SCAM not SPAM.

Moderators handle SPAM.... DT MEMBERS handle SCAM..