The first red flag: If you don't get it, it does not mean it is a joke.
It seems i got it all right, i just thought that you might have real answers.
The second red flag: You really did not study the project. Token holder did not invest in the space tourism neither it has been said anywhere. Psyche itself will invest in space tourism.
I never said that token holders invest into space tourism. i said your team is doing that (presumably with the private sale money) and i was pointing out between the lines that your investment doesn't benefit token holders. And if it would benefit them, it would be most likely automatically ruled as securities.
The third red flag: I am sure, you would have done your research before calling it an anonymous team. During the sale, the whole team details with their social links were on the website. Now it does not require there anymore so it has been moved. However, you can still find the team if you know how to, have you done the research?
Moved? My bad, i guess that the current potential investors shouldn't pay attention to them? I found them via linkedin and if they are real, i suppose it's good that someone can be held responsible.
The fourth red flag: If you have a serious concern with SEC and FAT or other regulatory frameworks, you wouldn't be here. The basic concept of crypto is P2P, I hope you are done googling that minimum.
You could have answered that you have researched how to fill the requirements to achieve regulatory compliant DeFi (#RegDeFi), but you chosen to admit that you are basically just hoping that you won't get caught because everyone is doing this anyway.
And it sounds like it's you who haven't figured out the concept of cryptocurrencies. Main reason for permissionless cryptocurrencies can exist is because they aren't centralized. When project has a sale/ico/ieo/ipo, SEC can rule your coins/tokens as unregistered securities. And guess what happens then? Who will keep developing this if you are in jail or your bank accounts are seized? And don't tell me that they can't seize your crypto when you have already stated that you will invest in space mining. Those companies btw are very regulatory friendly.
I'll leave my quote in here because you basically dismissed it and didn't answer to most of it:
I don't get this. Is this a joke? We are supposed to trust anonymous team that might have just sold unregistered securities to invest their money to space tourism and somehow this would benefit token holders? And somehow this fiat money traffic would happen under the radar of SEC, FATF and other regulatory framework?
And Anonymous balances with supposed stable coins sounds like a regulatory AML nightmare.