Quote from: justdimin on February 05, 2021, 07:16:32 PM

Quote from: mindrust on February 04, 2021, 02:13:52 PM

What's the deal with FUN tokens? Did freebitco.in implement these tokens because bitcoin became too high in value? If so maybe implementing LN would have been a better idea. I admit LN is too much trouble for the devs maybe that's why avoided it.

Or maybe It was a better idea to bring freedogecoin back. This is the first time I heard about FUN tokens tbh.

I can't lie having another coin in the website is a good idea, sure it is something you should do and the way you have used FUN tokens are very nice, but I am still very much against doing it with FUN and not something else. Do not be mistaken, I love "how" it is done, that is not really the part I am concerned with, in fact that is the part I love and definitely support 100% without interruption.

Only part I didn't like is the fun part, because that is not fun at all and not a big known one neither. If you want lower one Doge would have done but you have talked about how you didn't liked doge so you could go with tron? It is cheap, it is instantly transferred and there is nearly no transaction fee as well, that is why I personally would have preferred that. Obviously I would rather have the giants like ETH if I could but I understand why they may have been harder to implement.

Watch how FB will become "Free Fun Tokens" as the price of bitcoin rises then. Cool

They should have implemented the Lightning Network to prevent that route from happening imo. If Bitcoin keeps rising 1 satoshi wwill be more valuable than "$0.0020" which they give for 5 satoshis now.