Quote from: JUmpy14 on Today at 11:16:54 AM

Attention je ne porte pas de jugement

Les choses ont évolué vers du qualitatif voir professionnalisme (autant de merits ,tu passes plusieurs heures/jours sur le forum)

--<je retourne Stacker Cool

Si tu ne vises pas de gros payrates il y a pas mal de campagnes qui sont accessibles avec peu de merits si tant est que tu n'es pas le profil d'un pakistanais-bangladais-indonesien-philippin-nigerian

Quote from: The Pharmacist on August 24, 2018, 01:57:28 PM

I received a PM today with a typical excuse:

Quote from: djuragan on August 24, 2018, 08:20:04 AM

Hello sir,
I'm representing my friends to appeal about our accounts that you give negative trust due to this post.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4650049.0
I wish to inform you that those accounts not belong to a single person, we are making a community to perform bounty campaign.
Does working on bounty campaign with our own individual account against the rules?
About the those wallet that are connected to each other, we used it to safe the fee of transaction.
Some of our team today (the other member are working at home, at the moment):

here is our website : http://kidoelkempoel.com/index.html
Please kindly reconsider, and please remove the negative trust on our account.
Thank you.

I hear the explanation of what I bolded above a lot. Transaction fees are pretty damn low, so there's really no reason why funds should be pooled--and given that blockchain transactions are the only good way to prove accounts are connected, people shouldn't be doing this.

I'm hardly swayed by this picture, either. It shows a bunch of shitposters sitting around a shitposting table in a shitposting farm. They deserve negative trust just for that. Give me a fucking break. Guaranteed the women here don't care about bitcoin in the least. They got recruited to spam like suicide bombers get recruited by ISIS.