Quote from: Waldaniam on Today at 11:42:20 AM

Quote from: kay-cee on Today at 11:16:05 AM

That is normal from him, he does that to everybody no matter if you did something or not. Consider him as a Jester of bitcointalk forum, entertaining himself and us with scam accusations without any proof.

He is on the forum's administrator Theymos distrust list.

https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-13_Sat_04.07h/30747.html

~Vod's judgement is Distrusted by:
1. theymos (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (50) 7128 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

He should ban him for such behaviour. This is my old account and to boost it a little bit I paid for a copper membership almost $30. And now that idiot ruined my account without any reasons. I do not advise any one to purchase copper membership because it can be ruined any time by such individual as VOD.

If I correctly understood his statements in that posts, he even accused Theymos of running a ponzi in cooperation with OG NASTY.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5316570.msg56332507#msg56332507

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5314441.msg56334759#msg56334759

You have to have patience with vod.
He said he suffered brain death of approx 10%
I mean he red tagged someone that repeated this claim but said serious brain death.

Vod says 10% loss of brain function wasnt a serious loss I suppose.
Lol I guess I'd have to agree if you want split hairs. .

Like losing 10% of a near empty wallet isn't serious like losing 10% of a large fortune.

Vod is more weird and silly than malicious of greedy.

But sure is a trust abuser and scammer supporter. Take the debate to meta.
Ask if the reasoning behind the red tag is inline with what theymos intends to inflict on the forum or not.
Just state the reason dont get specific about vod. ..

So is it beneficial for the forum for red trust to be given for X
If we set a precedent that x can not form the basis for a red tag would that increase the value of red rags and prevent desensitization and dilution of legitmate and credible and valuable warnings. ?

I mean willful and consistent trust abuse could really be seen as aiding and facilitating scammers to remain unnoticed or taken less seriously as a threat.