Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: FORTUNEJACK.COM |Deposit 777 play with 1777 mBTC |Live Casino, Slots, Betting
by
EpicChamp
on 16/02/2021, 08:01:59 UTC


Most commonly, the users never decline the KYC request. According to the past, the vast majority of the customers who did cancel the request were involved in some sort of fraudulent activities (we don't say that the OP is among them) - to summarize: FJ as a company needs to work transparently and operate legally without breaking any laws in the countries that we specialize in.


-
Team FJ
Same thought after reading the last 2-3 pages of this thread , it looks like OP is really Hiding something about Himself.

The way he declined the KYC verification tells the real score here,because if he is really clean since he is claiming a Good amount of funds here for sure he will cooperate to end the story in good faith but what happens is the opposite scenario.

I have done nothing wrong in this situation and have nothing to hide. I simply do not want to send extremely personal + confidential documents to FJ or any other online gambling site. This is why I chose to bet with a crypto betting site - to keep my identity private and avoid having to do KYC if I want to withdraw my money.

That's the whole point of using bitcoins and crypto and going against that is completely ironic and defeats the whole point of betting with bitcoin instead of fiat. Especially when 99% of users on their site arent asked to submit KYC if they want to make a withdrawal either.

In this situation I simply took advantage of odds that I thought were favorable to me at the time and that's it; but once again I did not think there were any clear favorites in that match and I'm surprised that my player dropped to less than 1.7 odds after a few hours.

It is not right or fair for them to force me to send them my personal information when it has nothing to do with this case and especially when I did nothing wrong or suspicious on my end.