Quote from: spixel on March 11, 2014, 09:00:46 AM

Quote from: FUR11 on March 11, 2014, 08:54:08 AM

Quote from: spixel on March 11, 2014, 08:42:40 AM

Quote from: FUR11 on March 11, 2014, 08:38:43 AM

Quote from: spixel on March 11, 2014, 08:32:57 AM

People can think for themselves, stop thinking you're smarter.

What? If people can think for themselves, then it's entirely possible that the OP is smarter then them.

You know what I mean.

My opinion is OP is someone who's very into gambling, is annoyed he missed out on some of these ponzi's so has a personal vendetta against them and those who take part, simply because of his own choice (hence all the name calling)

I actually don't know what you mean, because you said something that doesn't make much sense.

Frankly, I think your opinion on OP's motives are incorrect. Do you support Nigerian email scams? Identity thieves? Why is it ok to take advantage of people in one way but not in others?

Do you honestly think the ponzi threads posted here are comparable to nigerian email scams and indentity thieves or are you just grasping at straws to try make a point? With these ponzi's you are told out straight its a ponzi. You know (and I did when I put money in one) that there's a chance I won't get it back. You're gambling on whether or not other people decide to invest after you, its not a scam. Even all the transactions are visible to help you make up your mind if the ponzi is slowing down etc.

I think to be considered as gambling, there should at least be a way to calculate the "house edge" or your % to win. With Ponzi's, you have no way of calculating that. It only depends on when the downline dries up. I think this is an issue that needs to be considered.. With casino games/dice games, at least I know what i'm up against.