Quote from: Tooleremedire on Today at 04:06:00 PM

Are transactions that contain SEGWIT addresses better to be listed in the next block because they often contain more fees than regular Legacy transactions?

For the transactions of the same raw size paying the same fees, Segwit transactions are more likely to be included into the next block. Their virtual size is much lower than the legacy transaction despite them having the same raw size. This results in the segwit transaction having a much larger fees/virtual size.

Quote from: Tooleremedire on Today at 04:06:00 PM

SEGWIT is soft forks are not implemented by all nodes and some block explore cant see SEGWIT addresses

Yes, but that doesn't affect anyone else. The majority of the network and the miners are recognizing segwit addresses right now; this means that segwit transactions will have a good propagation. Having nodes or block explorers that are un-upgraded will not result in miners not accepting segwit transactions. If they can't recognize it, then you shouldn't be using them.