Quote from: cryptonit on February 19, 2021, 08:18:57 AM

a validator size junk of DMD

I looked up the definition of junk in the dictionary it says "discarded material". You probably mean chunk: "a thick mass". I'm not natively english speaking either so I'm guessing that's the meaning. If there is need for translations I can probably do thai and swedish.

On the language subject I've got another acronym suggestion: DMD, Digital Monetary Diamonds.
Digital because DMD is well...digital. Monetary because DMD is built with Aristotle's properties of sound money (durable, divisible, transferable, scarce, recognizable, fungible) and Diamonds because DMD's hard security and responding to pressure with improved characteristics.

Quote from: cryptonit on February 19, 2021, 08:18:57 AM

regarding staking minimum of 100 DMD even if DMD is at 100$ thats in reach for a normal guy in developed countries

I think DMD can go higher, $1000+. Could be 1 DMD 1 vote actually! In the future. A DMDocracy.
We just need more people to find DMD for store of value and work opportunity.

Quote from: cryptonit on February 19, 2021, 08:18:57 AM

the dao can decide to fund development of a code upgrade to lower min staking amount ''

That's great.

Quote from: cryptonit on February 19, 2021, 08:18:57 AM

they should start small and have a great explaination why it make sense trust them with a small amount so they can build something great for DMD ecosystem

How about payment on delivery? Or some in advance and some after?

Quote from: cryptonit on February 19, 2021, 08:18:57 AM

that just add more players we have to trust
goverments judges lawyers banks and so on.......

Only if really needed.

Quote from: cryptonit on February 19, 2021, 08:18:57 AM

but think bigger in fact its already possible and the possibilities will raise to own gold real estate shares and company tokens and so on on a blockchain and most of that projects run on ethereum smart contract platforms and as such are possible moveable over a bridge towards DMDv4 chain

Good point.

Quote from: cryptonit on February 19, 2021, 08:18:57 AM

so what i think is just a piece of the dao voting power and what direction it will go

Yes but i think you also have trust, influence and insights from your long involvement with the project and open discussion is good in general so thanks for your time to answer my questions.

Actually I have a few ideas for the DAO, some of which I wouldn't want to disclose here just yet for perhaps they are not good or so good that someone else will steal them. It includes building an exchange and a payment system with some specific properties. It would bring income to the DAO and increase DMD price if a team would do such a large undertaking.