Quote from: tygeade on February 21, 2021, 06:11:07 AM

Quote from: DrBeer on February 20, 2021, 09:55:59 AM

The meaning of the topic is not a bit about taxes. It meant that you should force rich people to "share" their money with the poor. Taxes are a little different. Taxes form budgets that provide social security and other "services" that the state provides, including you. Taxes are PENSIONS, taxes are social assistance, taxes are medicine, and much more. When you retire, you will receive it from taxes that others pay. This is normal practice. But just take your money from your wallet and give it to a lumpenized citizen who simply does not want to work but wants to live well - this is not acceptable, I completely agree here. The principle is simple - if you are not a person with disabilities - WORK! No education - there is a lot of work that does not require higher education or specialized knowledge!

Well, I do agree with you to a degree but that is just an ignorant point of view when you consider how little amount of work available for everyone. Just to make it clear I mean that people who go to college and get a degree fails to find any job in their own place about their own job, most of the time they either go to another career or they just switch places and relocate, and even when they complain about it, they are told "well you shouldn't studied social studies in that case and get a stem degree!!!", why? Why shouldn't they study social studies? What is wrong with psychology? Or art history? They are all very valuable and these people finished colleges for that topic, they should find a job.

On the other side we do not have enough work available for everyone living in all nations, even if every single job was filled and no company was looking for a new worker, there will be unemployed people. So long story short it is not always about "people who want to not work" it is about people who can't find work.

I understood you. Let us be pragmatists and not philosophers? Let me explain - there is always an imbalance between the demand for specialties and the field of education that trains these specialists. If a person CONSCIOUSLY chooses a profession that he simply LIKES, but the person has not found the strength to evaluate the market and the application of his knowledge after receiving education. This is bad. A person loses time, hope, joins the ranks of the unemployed. Such a final is quite predictable if the input "I like", but there is no assessment "how to use it?" In my country, when the surge in private business began, everyone suddenly decided that the market really needed an accountant. And by 2000, there were so many accountants on the market that no one knew where to put them. In addition, the massive "training for accountants" has collapsed the labor market for this profession. And then for many years, there were a huge number of accountants who were forced to work for a penny or even sit without work. This also happens. Therefore, when making plans for training, it is always necessary to assess the labor market. I hope I clearly explained my idea on this issue.