Quote from: organizer on March 11, 2014, 04:31:41 PM

Quote from: LimLims on March 11, 2014, 01:28:42 PM

Quote from: organizer on March 11, 2014, 01:15:13 PM

Criticisms:

Your media outreach is a bit unrealistic and it's not helpful to just list the "big boys" and say an article. You want real media outreach. Include the big boys, but you can't expect any of those to take notice of DRK at this point. Your bounty should be way more specific:

1. Compile a list of "influencial" cryptocurrency bloggers to conduct outreach to (approx 10-20 to start). This list needs to include contact information and be approved before outreach begins.

2. Write (and get approved) an outreach letter/email. This should be short and concise introducing the currency, the developer and providing the person you are contacting an incentive to reply back (i.e. the developer is making himself available for an interview, online Q&A sessions).

3. Nominate a single (or no more than a few people) to conduct the outreach. Bounties in the wild will just lead to mass confusion with no one "officially" representing the project. Trust me, if random people just start spamming "WRITE AN ARTICLE ABOUT DRK" with no real connection to the coin, nothing will happen.

You need to set into place some sort of review & approval process if you want to be professional about this. Set up a real process to conduct outreach If the team is inexperienced have them start with the smaller journalists to do trial runs.

The Security Bounties Are Very Vague
If you are really going to control this, you need to really understand the importance of the testing/QA and final endorsement of the security community to this coin.

Again, random, small bounties for bugs isn't the right approach. You need to get someone in place who can do the research to find a notable third-party, respected party in the world of security and crypto to audit the security and the goal being some sort of endorsement at the end of the process. Right now, these are bug-fixes.

This is the most important part of your list and all other stuff needs to be secondary. Again, if this coin can't deliver on the anonymous stuff, all other efforts are in vein. Getting reviewed by/endorsed by someone notable is what you are striving for.

Thank you, this is excellent critcism. Unfortunately I have a day job and only so much time to coordinate these bounties and write up detailed conditions for security testing. Hmm, maybe I can make a bounty for that...

So on that note: who wants to help define these bounties in more detail, answer queries & validate submissions? I could definitely use the help.

Well PM me if you ever want input, i too have RL job but I do want this to succeed. I think it's one of the very few coins out that has a chance of making something out of itself.

I think you just need to really learn how to prioritize things and focus on the right things to help the coin succeed. This can be done with a simple yes/no question on whether the item is a key factor for success. Many of those items aren't, at this phase, imo.

Look at the hype something like Ethereum gets. It's from technical discussions, whether through articles, white papers and most important conferences.

One item you should amend to the list is a travel fund, if the dev is into it, to get him to go to (and speak at) conferences. Get noticed and many of those other pieces (like media attention and legit parties willing to audit/test the code) fall into place.

It seems to me that both of you seem to have a grasp on this. I'll try to be more of a resource....once I'm caught up with our renos at the winery. PM me if you need anything specific. Sorry LimLims for the delay in response. I'll keep donating DRK... another 50 DRK right now. Wink