Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on Today at 05:40:59 PM

Quote from: t0nyst4r on Today at 05:38:49 PM

"Fixed" clbitcrack as in using an older build like 0.30, or a fixed version of 0.31? I just tried 0.30 and while it finds all keys ok, it's about half as fast as 0.31. I have 3090's so I believe I'm stuck using clbitcrack until the misaligned address issue is fixed for these newer cards that require the newer CUDA.

What are you searching for? Are you searching for #64 (btc puzzle/transaction 64 bit) or just random keys?

For now, I am just testing that clbitcrack is working properly by using some of the public test keys against their known keyspace (same list of test keys others are using here). As others have complained, 0.31 has an issue finding private keys and it reaches the end of the keyspace without finding the keys. 0.30 seems to find all keys using the same list, but for me it's half as fast as 0.31 (when I let it run on a private list of addresses where the keys are unknown). With my 3090 using clbitcrack 0.31, I get about 1050MKey/s whereas with 0.30 I get 600MKey/sec. But why run 0.31 if it's never going to find any keys with the known issue.

Another issue people had was clbitcrack would find some of the known keys but not all of them (versus not finding any). Not sure what version has that issue or if it's just with certain GPU's, but it something else I am testing for too.

So I guess my question is, is there an actual fix for clbitcrack 0.31 that doesn't have any of these issues but still has the speed improvements that comes with 0.31? Or, if there's another program that's currently developed and supports 3090's and would work better, please let me know. I am basically just trying to recover private keys from a list of known wallet addresses by incrementally scanning the private keyspace. I know this is exactly what Bitcrack does, but not sure about the others, i.e. VanitySearch, Kangaroo, etc