compulsory vaccination, etc. for a virus whose overall mortality it's below 1%. This is not about rich and poor.
It is to an extent about young and old, though. If you're young and healthy then chances are you won't suffer serious effects... but that's not really the point. If you're young and healthy and coughing Covid onto everyone, chances are you'll infect someone who is more vulnerable.
Precisely because it is a question of young and old, we are not going to think that people over 90 will live forever.
Restrictive measures should have been taken with the elderly and people with risk factors, but no politician has wanted to impose quarantines and lockdowns only on the elderly because he knew he had a lot of votes to lose.
For the young and healthy, vaccination isn't so much about protecting the individual as it is about protecting the more vulnerable people in society. Same with face masks, social distancing, etc.
Anti-vaxxers can kill other people by refusing to take the vaccine.
You don't know what current vaccines do. For people who get vaccinated they prevent them from get serious symptoms, so if you get vaccinated, you don't have to worry about me getting vaccinated or not. Anti-vaxxers is a word you have pulled out of your sleeve to disqualify without arguments. I am pro-vaccine, but I am against being forced to take this one.
It's more about ideology: the sheep and those who resist, who protest.
I think it's more about morality and empathy. The selfish, and those who want to protect everyone.
Here we go disqualifying again. So this is about morally superior beings and evil beings who refuse to get vaccines. Come on!