Quote from: TimeTeller on March 01, 2021, 09:09:46 PM

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on March 01, 2021, 12:20:35 PM

If they are lying about writing their white paper, what successes can you ask? They made a beautiful picture and nothing more. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5320685.0

Can the ARNO team answer about this plagiarism issue?
This project is highly technical and needs real expertise in nanotechnology.
Why did you resort to copying your content to different resources?
How do we know that the team members that you published are really part of this project?
Artem, Head of the Project, haven't mentioned ARNO as part of his project in his linkedin account.
If he is really part of this, can you ask to add this ARNO project in his portfolio?
Also, please add linkedin acct of the DPL of the Engineering project, Serguei V.Shuskov.

Thanks for your comment and your questions. We will try to give you a comprehensive answer.

Can the ARNO team answer about this plagiarism issue?
- answer:
In the Russian language there is such a catch phrase - "I did something nasty - this is joy in my heart." We have always strived and will continue to strive to understand other people, even if they set their goal in life simply to denigrate everything and everything for any reason available to them.
We are always open to constructive dialogue and are ready to provide our partners and, in general, all interested parties with reliable information about the project, even if it carries a negative connotation.

This project is highly technical and needs real expertise in nanotechnology.
- answer:
This statement is absolutely true. The competence of our team in this area can be confirmed, for example, by numerous publications and obtained patents (our team publishes at least 12 printed works per year and receives 4-5 patents). This information is open and is not hidden from anyone.

Why did you resort to copying your content to different resources?
- answer:
The question is not very clear. When placed on trackers, the information is always validated by the channel without fail. And it is rated. And to provide different channels with different information is not entirely correct, as it seems to us. Or did you mean something else?

How do we know that the team members that you published are really part of this project?
- answer:
Why do many of us believe in the existence of God, for example? Or that the Earth is square (as an option - flat)? Convincing a person of something is not a big deal. But, in our case, the presence of just announced people in our team is quite, again, validated on trackers and is a prerequisite for placement and listing.

Artem, Head of the Project, haven't mentioned ARNO as part of his project in his linkedin account.
- answer:
This statement is absolutely not true. If you suddenly decide to look at Artem's personal pages, you will immediately and completely make sure that belonging to the project with an indication of the space occupied in it is there explicitly.

If he is really part of this, can you ask to add this ARNO project in his portfolio?
- answer:
Again, the essence of the question is not very clear. Nobody requested such a portfolio and it was not provided to anyone as unnecessary. If it is about personal information on LinkedIn, then filling it out is everyone's personal business. And this is more a matter of being overloaded with work and family.

Also, please add linkedin acct of the DPL of the Engineering project, Serguei V.Shuskov.
- answer:
It is a little unclear why you needed such a formality, but every member of the team has Facebook and Linkedin pages. And they are provided at the request of exactly the team member to whom they belong.
Initially, all contacts were posted under the personas, but the amount of spam and obscene offers that immediately began to arrive on publicly published pages was so great that now this information is no longer available.