Quote from: halfcab123 on March 11, 2014, 10:47:33 PM

Quote from: nakaone on March 11, 2014, 10:00:19 PM

Quote from: kdrop22 on March 11, 2014, 05:09:17 PM

Quote from: sumantso on March 11, 2014, 05:04:51 PM

Quote from: BitThink on March 11, 2014, 07:08:08 AM

Many burners are too lazy to install all the dependencies to sell their coins. Therefore, the web wallet may attract buyers slowly in long term, but bring a lot of sellers immediately.

Pretty much and besides, the web wallet would have already been priced in.

Expecting cheaper XCPs in the near future.

Yes, but at the current prices we are at 25% market cap of Mastercoin. A very attractive valuation.

that is the decisive point: either msc is massively overvalued or xcp massively undervalued, with respect to all other altcoins I have an opinion regarding that.

I was on the Worldcoin bandwagon in December. And I vividly remember being so hyped on new exchange additions and then Scharmbeck, and radio show appearances, one thing after another and the price went from over a dollar to 7 cents...

The difference here of course is that this is not a clone coin, this is something that has real value to add. I guess the thing I'm worried about most is that the web wallet comes out and *crickets*.... What will it take to outshine what Mastercoin is doing ? I watched the talk of decentralized _________ <== fill in the blank at Bitcoin Miami, Mastercoin, ethereum, and bitshares (invictus) were all there, nothing was mentioned about Counterparty. Strange. I'm still holding, just saying, it may indeed rely quite a bit on marketing even when you do have a useful protocol of great intrinsic value.

I thought there was going to be a greater focus on marketing once xcp is more user friendly? Makes sense intuitively to direct resources to ironing out technical issues, then focus on marketing, pr etc. when there is a more polished 'product'.