Quote from: squatz1 on Today at 03:01:43 AM

Quote from: jackg on Today at 02:01:00 AM

There so many pages here but if you're still keeping track of this, in March for the past 5 years 8000-12000 people die a week. A high number of them are likely old people so many people may have had the vaccine and subsequently died of something unrelated (because that's what happens when you give a vaccine to someone with a 1 in 3 chance of dying per year they're alive - in their 90s).

...

You’re totally right as you’re using critical thinking as the way to get to your solution. The regular infection has a very high chance of killing someone who is older (I’ll say 65+) while the vaccine has not killed anyone after usage of it.

Quote from: William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin

“When you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind; it may be the beginning of knowledge, but you have scarely, in your thoughts advanced to the stage of science.”

It would be nearly trivial to tease out the truth of the effects of the vaccine using some basic statistics if one had reliable data. This is why attacks on data are so pernicious and widespread among the power structures who hold the reigns of control at this time (e.g., the CDC and by extension, those who influence that entity.)

The best that any earnest independent analysts can get is VAERS data with a reporting rate which runs at under 1% and has no reporting standards whatsoever. There is no way that this is an accident.