Quote from: nimogsm on March 14, 2021, 11:15:56 AM

Quote from: Dron Pelya on March 13, 2021, 05:52:11 PM

Quote from: nimogsm on March 12, 2021, 08:15:39 PM

Quote from: bitgov on March 10, 2021, 09:32:06 AM

Quote from: Sovryn on March 06, 2021, 09:46:04 PM

Thank you to everyone who has participated in the Sovryn Bounty program and shout out to Bounty Portals for the help in running the show.

We will now look at getting your rewards out. SOV tokens become liquid on 26th March so please bear with us as we arrange distribution.

If you are a translation bounty participant there is additional time to finish translations and we are still happy to hear from anyone who can help translate the blackpaper.

Do join us on discord where our SOV community hang out, we would love to see you there.

Stay Sovryn

Sorry to bother you with this question, but I'd rather ask twice than lose my funds.

Do I need to have my ERC20 address set to RSK network in Metamask during distributing rewards?

or

Distribution will take place anyway, and I just need to change the network to see the assets?

A good question,most likely we will register new addresses or there will be some other scheme.In any case, there is still time and the manager will notify us.

I don't see any problem if participants of bounty campaign used ERC20 addresses from Metamask. They just need to configure RSK network in Metamask to see SOV in their wallets. So why are you gong to register new addresses?

If you switch to rsk, the wallet address will be the same?I rarely work with metamask, so I ask.The networks are essentially different.If everything can be left as it is, I will be only too happy.

The address will be the same but the address will appear on the RSK explorer when you have sent it with a small amount of RBTC. it's clearly said that you can't see your address on rsk explorer when you are not funding it with a small amount of coin or tokens that supported by RSK network.