Quote from: tyz on Today at 12:17:19 PM

da der NEM-Preis sehr stabil bleibt und damit andeutet, dass die meisten der Investoren bisher nicht der Meinung sind und für NEM durchaus eine Zukunft sehen.

Ja, das scheint wohl auch der Fall zu sein, wenn man die Top100 zu verschienden Zeitpunkten vergleicht. Das hatte auch ein User im engl. Faden netterweise schon gemacht. Wink

Quote from: jkoil on March 13, 2021, 09:51:47 AM

If Devs cashed out, then Why in the NEM rich list (https://nemnodes.org/richlist/) still exist Devs (Jaguar, gimre, Alice) with the same XEM amounts as since 2015 ?

The one exact math, which is every time forgotten, is the fact that when someone sells, then also someone buys.
According to the distribution list changes the big owners have not sold. Of course some of them have sold, but in the big picture they have not sold, because the Top100 has increased their ownings from 57 % to 71 %.

Distribution Fri, 05 Jan 2018 18:33:44 UTC:
Top Accounts     XEM     Percentage
Top 50     4,804,818,406.12     53.4%
Top 100     5,119,481,371.59     56.9%
Top 200     5,455,792,305.26 60.6%
Top 250     5,609,101,108.18 62.3%
Top 500     6,365,621,548.69 70.7%
All     8,999,999,999     100%

Distribution Fri, 12 Mar 2021 05:39:36 UTC:
Top Accounts     XEM     Percentage
Top 50     6,166,236,694.24 68.5%
Top 100     6,423,452,170.92     71.4%
Top 200     6,739,353,256.10 74.9%
Top 250     6,890,203,307.06     76.6%
Top 500     7,543,466,571.50 83.8%
All     8,999,999,999 100%

That may be mainly caused by the exchanges' accounts (people have moved their XEMs there...), but still: the Top100 individual owners have not sold much of their ownings. Now can easily be detected only 3 names whose accounts have been "emptied": mixmaster, bogdana and rockethead.