Quote from: OgNasty on March 25, 2021, 08:17:25 PM

Why would it seem odd that this has exceeded my expectations?

I believe I've answered this in the prior post. And, your FPGA example does not represent what you've setup here with NastyMining/NastyFans. But, if you really need me to entertain your irrelevant example, let's adjust it to you paying BTC for the FPGA. Unless that FPGA makes its BTC back, it was a bad BTC investment, and you probably should have just kept the BTC.

Quote from: OgNasty on March 25, 2021, 08:17:25 PM

As for the stated goal of NastyFans being to get BTC in the hands of NastyFans... I think you literally just made that up.

I stated that you said your goal (NastyMining) was to get BTC in the hands of NastyFans. Nice play on words though.

In case you were too lazy to go back through our PMs, you definitely said it. Unlike you, I don't make things up, never have.. and I don't intend to start now.

Quote from: OgNasty on December 18, 2020, 03:35:42 AM

Quote from: justdigging on December 07, 2017, 05:31:32 PM

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5154737/Bitcoin-miner-NiceHash-reports-hack-theft-wallet.html

'$60 MILLION' Bitcoin theft: Hackers steal huge haul as value of the cryptocurrency soars to record high of $15,000
...

We have received our final payout from Nicehash for funds that were stolen in the 2017 hack. This makes a 100% recovery of BTC that we were owed.
~

You seem to be able to comprehend BTC for BTC when it favors you. How would you have felt if nicehash would have just returned the current USD rate in 2020 for BTC funds stolen in 2017?