Quote from: xhomerx10 on Today at 05:34:13 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on Today at 05:17:09 PM

[.......[edited out].........

........., and whether they achieve $200k in this particular scenario or some lesser or greater number.. who fucking cares, it still ends up in a pretty damned BIG ASS price correction that scares the shit out of participants and motivates them into taking profits during the correction including at the bottom of the correction.. just like they have done historically and are likely to continue into the future.. whether peeps believe in a supercycle bullshit or not.

You heard it here first... hahahahahaha

When Saylor said "I don't expect an 80% downturn", it's because he plans to preemptively buy all the fuckin' dips which means it's going up forever ~~Laura~~ JJG!

Hahahahahaha

Good one homer, snomer, blomer...

I stand by my original commentening on the topic.

Tongue

By the way, when you get reckt as fuck because you were banking on the supercycle and counting on your buddy Saylor the tailor to be ready, willing and able to buy all the dips, don't come crying to me with your empty wallet that are only hodling bitcoin.. you can go poor on the street.. with your bags of bitcoin.

Quote from: Richy_T on Today at 05:51:43 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on Today at 04:52:13 PM

I think that Laura needs to change her journalistic philosophy.

She has been covering bitcoin and various shitcoins that she deems as "crypto currencies" for several years, and she has been a pretty BIG name in the bitcoin space.. but she has maintained a journalistic integrity position for quite a while in terms of NOT investing in bitcoin, and sooner or later, she better get some fucking clues about failing/refusing to protect her own lil selfie by continuing to fail/refuse to establish a reasonable stake in bitcoin....

Definitely not a good move on her part. While I had a good talk with my crypto-naïve friend about people talking their book (and put particular stress on counting me in that also), while holding Bitcoin *will* bias your output, so will *not* holding Bitcoin. What she's seeking is not journalistic integrity but to have credibility with the Bitcoin deniers which is a losing battle. Doubly so I would say as actually having some skin in the game gives you an appreciation for the world of currency and economics it's hard to have without.

Actually, your response, Richy_T reminds me of Stolfi, and he was presenting himself in this thread as trying to do some kind of similar objectivity and lack of participation thing when he was posting in this thread in 2014-2016 or whenever it was that he was posting in this thread.

Members here would frequently criticize Stolfi for NOT having any fucking clue in respect to some of the topics he was talking about in regards to various aspects regarding how some aspects of bitcoin worked because he had not even tried some of the basic actions of setting up a wallet or even putting some money on an exchange and practicing to use some of the services of some exchanges that he was non-experientially criticizing.

I am pretty sure that Laura has done some of the basics in regards to setting up some bitcoin and shitcoin wallets, including getting involved in some ethereum and other bullshit in various ways in order to attempt to better understand some of the topics that she was interviewing upon, but surely some of her knowledge has been limited in the degree of her failure/refusal to invest in bitcoin in any kind of material and substantial way.