Quote from: donut on March 13, 2014, 03:36:09 AM

Quote from: freedomno1 on March 13, 2014, 03:28:31 AM

Quote from: Chris_Sabian on March 13, 2014, 12:47:28 AM

Quote from: eb3full on March 13, 2014, 12:39:32 AM

I also received 0.00007777 per share. Were these dividends fairly distributed to shareholders? What's going on?

31.10807011 from Mining Address / 400,000 shares = 0.000077770

Not sure what the other talk was about.

Dividend in blockchain shows 0.00008971 BTC/Share for most holders only early sends get the 0.000077770
Can observe it from the sending address

https://blockchain.info/address/115tTroRo3B9ZDQ6ATJGDCHcNEVbjJoZnF

I'd say most got 0.00007777. I did.

There's 3 transaction after this, and 27 before.

Figured it out FC recieved the 10 BTC while sending out I assume the algo divided it among those remaining users equally resulting in the weird dividend

Throws in a classic
The first become last and the last become first in getting a bit more dividend

I did some recalclations

Early Dividends Most users at 0.00007777 BTC / Share
A few users recieved 0.0008674 BTC / Share
The Last users BTC was sent to recieved recieved 0.00008971BTC/ Share

So three different dividends Grin

Confirm this through division it needs to end up as a whole number

Edit: Sorry I meant it showed 0.00008971 per share for the last holders most users got 0.00007777
Not most holders got the larger number
Was wondering why Smiguel went with 0.00007777 but must have been watching the first sends the last sends were different