Quote from: nutildah on Today at 01:50:39 AM

Its your word versus mine.

In which delusional fantasy is prima facie evidence clearly shown up-front a matter of “your word versus mine”? Roll Eyes

Quote from: nutildah on Today at 01:50:39 AM

So far nobody has taken your word. Not one person. Perhaps you should reconsider the evidence once and a while before you try so desperately to attack somebody's reputation? I could dredge up your days sexting a minor publicly on the forum if you like, but I'm just not that kind of person.

Wow. Blatant defamation and extortion in one shot—and done for the purpose of trying to induce me to drop a prima facie valid accusation against you. You must be worried! (archive.is)

You should “reconsider” doing X, because I could “dredge up” scandal Y, “but I’m just not that kind of person” is a quite classic form of blackmail threat. I will tag you accordingly.

It won’t work, because: (0) You materially misrepresented what happened. In the only thread which even comes close to matching your description (archive), I was “sexting publicly on the forum” with a party that theymos had age-verified; and n.b. that at least three current DTs were directly involved in that thread, all of whom found it delightful and not otherwise. (1) The thread is indeed public. Indeed, I myself just linked to that thread three days ago!

Quote from: nullius on April 02, 2021, 12:29:02 PM

My puns about elliptic curves were first seen in 2018; they even have an old thread in Off-Topic. (Several threads; I don’t want to link to the others.)

(Note: Those “other” threads had nothing to do with alia, and were made by me after alia was outed as a scammer and banned.)

“Perhaps you should reconsider... I could dredge up something totally public that you don’t even try to hide” is—well, let’s put it this way: Are you high right now?

Quote from: nutildah on Today at 01:50:39 AM

Quote from: nullius on Today at 01:28:42 AM

I left you negative trust feedback for plagiarism, because you committed plagiarism; it is that simple.

since when is plagiarism something that negative feedback should be left for?

I tag for plagiarism. That is off-topic in Meta; if you disagree with my tag, consider opening yet another “nullius trust abuse” topic in Reputation. I will probably ignore it, even if I see it; it has been months since I followed Reputation on any regular basis, and if I want to waste my time wading through the muck there, I have higher priorities and planned posts.

Quote from: nutildah on Today at 01:50:39 AM

Quote from: nullius on Today at 01:28:42 AM

you are a self-made psychotic

compared to you I'm as stable as a rock. I have nothing left to say to you, putting you back on ignore where you belong.

Eh. I’m sure that if you trip hard enough, you can believe that pretending to ignore me makes me upset or angry or something. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Quote from: nutildah on Today at 01:50:39 AM

have a great day fuckwadius.

Hey. Assigning such cute names to people is TOAA’s job. My official nickname is nerdius, you nut-case!

Sorry, CH; I do not intend to insult you by comparing you to notil-duh here. I am sincerely trying to protect your turf with the cute nicknames. Mine is awesome!

The foregoing discussion goes far off-topic for this thread. Most of it belongs in Reputation, not even in Meta; and the rest of it belongs in the plagiarism accusation thread.

Loth though I may be to complain about nutildah bumping my thread here, I must request that we please stay on topic:

Quote from: nullius on Today at 12:13:04 AM

I am, in essence, benevolently trolling in an attempt to push people to think about what plagiarism is, and what harm it causes. To question the nature of my “plagiarism” (or as I call it, my contraplagiarism), the reader must develop a clear concept of why that rule exists. Why do I say that I am doing nothing wrong, when I cheerfully stipulate that I am intentionally violating the rule? What could I possibly mean? To follow that train of thought, one must examine plagiarism from first principles.