Quote from: janding on Today at 12:41:07 AM

Where this much money is involved in this type of industry and software, it would be irresponsible for the developers
to identify themselves and put themselves and their family in uncertain danger.

I agree. It is undesirable to risk winding up on this list: https://github.com/jlopp/physical-bitcoin-attacks

The maintainer of that list is not anonymous; his name is Jameson Lopp. However, he took extraordinary measures to “vanish” after he himself suffered a real-world physical attack.

Quote from: janding on Today at 12:41:07 AM

You can't control stupidity. I also don't feel sorry for any person who is incapable of following plain and simple
security instructions.

Security instructions: Use PGP for code signing. Generating a PGP key does not require identifying oneself, just as with generating a Bitcoin key.

Quote from: janding on Today at 12:41:07 AM

The only people who have had a problem with the PhoenixMiner are the idiots that downloaded a hacked version
from an unauthorized link on a forum page that the developers have said NEVER do.

If that is true, past performance is no guarantee of future results. What if Github gets hacked? What if a Github employee acts maliciously, or an Amazon employee with access to Github’s AWS download backend, or...?

Every serious crypto project uses PGP signatures to verify downloads. Bitcoin Core does not rely on Github’s security, or the security of any download server; they have a highly sophisticated process for making sure that what you download is what the developers are trying to give you, and it is all ultimately anchored in PGP signatures. See what I said above about Monero—oh, and I think you can be sure that the Monero people love anonymity! Examples abound...

Quote from: janding on Today at 12:41:07 AM

Mining takes a certain amount of knowledge, faith, trust and risk.

By design, mining is supposed to be trustless.

Quote from: janding on Today at 12:41:07 AM

If anyone has reservations about the honesty or the safety of the code they are running they should simply format their hard
drives and open a bank savings account. And that is also not 100% safe and secure.

LOL, bank account. I do not trust that. I trust my Bitcoin wallet (and my underlying OS) much more. Of course, I have verified the origin of every bit of code on my system using digital signatures—no exceptions! There is no excuse to do otherwise! (I have also audited not-insignificant portions of the source code myself; but that is obviously no way to exclude all vectors for malicious code.)