Quote from: TryNinja on Today at 03:22:46 PM

Quote from: okamuwf on April 11, 2021, 04:09:01 PM

essa atualizacao Berlin ainda nao impactara a ethereum como esperado. A atualizacao London eh que tera maior impacto na minha opiniao, pois vira com a EIP 1559 que ira diminuir as taxas de rede que hoje estao em valor proibitivo para transacionar entre carteiras.

Eu não entendo esse papo da EIP-1559 diminuir as taxas da rede. A EIP propõe que a taxa base seja queimada e uma taxa opcional possa ser enviada aos mineradores, mas como isso diminui as taxas? Isso só ajuda o ETH a se tornar uma moeda deflacionaria, não?

Esse diminuição em 50% da recompensa das taxas é o ponto mais discutido pois afeta a renda dos mineradores..

Porém outro ponto desse EIP é fazer com que fique mais fácil de estimar uma taxa.. Hoje em dia é uma bola de neve, um usuário entra e paga um gwei mais alto para entrar no próximo bloco.. e o próximo usuário faz o mesmo e assim sucessivamente até que as taxas fiquem estáveis a níveis absurdos..

Quote from: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1559.md

The proposal in this EIP is to start with a base fee amount which is adjusted up and down by the protocol based on how congested the network is. When the network exceeds the target per-block gas usage, the base fee increases slightly and when capacity is below the target, it decreases slightly. Because these base fee changes are constrained, the maximum difference in base fee from block to block is predictable. This then allows wallets to auto-set the gas fees for users in a highly reliable fashion. It is expected that most users will not have to manually adjust gas fees, even in periods of high network activity. For most users the base fee will be estimated by their wallet and a small inclusion fee, which compensates miners taking on orphan risk (e.g. 1 nanoeth), will be automatically set. Users can also manually set the transaction max fee to bound their total costs.

Transaction Ordering
With most people not competing on inclusion fees and instead using a baseline fee to get included, transaction ordering now depends on individual client internal implementation details such as how they store the transactions in memory. It is recommended that transactions with the same inclusion fee be sorted by time the transaction was received to protect the network from spamming attacks where the attacker throws a bunch of transactions into the pending pool in order to ensure that at least one lands in a favorable position. Miners should still prefer higher tip transactions over those with a lower tip, purely from a selfish mining perspective.

Vai mudar MUITA coisa? Não.