Quote from: suchmoon on April 17, 2021, 09:06:01 PM

Now it's been moved above the calculator so they're clearly tweaking it as they're reading this thread. Sketchy AF.

You wrote this an hour after my post above, in which I explained how the text was moved according to LoyceV suggestion. You even quoted the post...? The note was added a while back because of a few incidents involving people failing to comply with the minimum deposit and BTC price spiking really high. It was not there a year ago when the article was published.

Quote from: suchmoon on April 17, 2021, 09:06:01 PM

They should refund you, pay the TX fees out of pocket, and apologize profusely.

At this point it is getting quite frustrating how people whose posts are paid for by the competition keep telling me how to run the service. Throwing dirt left and right without a single valid proof nor even reason.

The visuals of MCM have been updated to reflect the constructive feedback received. If your input can be brought down to "sketchy AF... Edit: Oh, I did not notice... Still sketchy [proof based on a year old article]", please refrain from posting. To be clear, the same goes for anyone defending MCM.

Quote from: mantari on April 17, 2021, 08:39:46 PM

Seems this text was added after our short discussion. A refund would be fair in this case, this MCM address is already exposed anyway.

You are right. I got too involved with LoyceV post and did not read the dates carefully. I was not expecting such post so long after the incident. I was considering adding such note after the price of BTC nearly quadrupled in a single month - making 0.003 BTC worth significantly more.

There are other reasons past address exposure for not issuing the refund - it takes my effort to fix your mistake; any interaction with the wallet puts not only 0.003 BTC but all XX BTC at risk - but in this one instance I am willing to award you a *bug bounty* as you ultimately helped the site to get better. Please send me an email with an address you want the 0.0032 BTC to be transferred to.

@LoyceV, @suchmoon
Please do a little more research before posting your conclusions. The fact you accuse MCM of deliberately stealing $90 (at the time, only because BTC price just spiked) is a bit embarrassing...